I meant the width.
Does that mean the dial face size remains the same but only the bezel gets narrower on the 682 vs the 243?
That would explain why I feel the way I do about it.
Not particularly sure about the dial. I have not measured it. But if the bezel was reduced by around 1mm, then the rest of the difference from 2mm would be borne by the dial. But since the dial is wider than the bezel, the 1mm or less difference doesn't seem significant.