• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

Oyster Perpetual 41mm 124300 KING

bertieng

I'm Pretty Popular
26/11/18
1,258
481
83
Can you put a gen dial into the King's case, the dial also fits on top of the movement too? Any idea?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockdaytona

HacknHand

Getting To Know The Place
10/3/22
51
38
18
I received my KING OP41 in silver the other day after a hassle free transaction with a RWI TD.

Some observations when comparing it to my EWF:
  1. KING and EWF look identical, same hands, dial, case, bezel, lume, etc. nothing is distinctly different even with a loupe
  2. KING (head only) is 62.5 grams, EWF is 59.9 grams, an indistinguishable difference on the wrist
  3. KING movement (rotor) is much quieter than EWF when given a gentle to moderate shake (no bracelet)
  4. KING stem tube threads have better engagement than EWF but they're much rougher, the machining is poor - they will probably bed in with use but cross-threading is a real risk
  5. KING crown has much, much sharper beveled edges than EWF, easier to grip but feels far less premium than EWF
  6. KING winding feels rougher than EWF but at the same time less fragile
  7. KING has disconcerting feedback when fully wound but EWF feels like it might break at any time
  8. KING (mine) keeps better time than (my) EWF... KING is about +5s per day, EWF is about +15s per day
So, the KING is not the revelation over the EWF I was hoping it might be but it does feel mechanically more sound, even if the finishing is a little worse.

My only disappointment is that I can't get my EWF Jubilee bracelet to properly engage with the KING head, it's a bit strange because the KING Oyster bracelet mates perfectly to the EWF head with no obvious (under loupe) EL gaps... the springbar alignment must be 0.?mm out but I can't see where/how and i don't know how to fix this. It's a pity because I think the basic Rolex Oyster bracelet (reps) suck and also don't even look that good.
 

aHero

Watch Bro
Certified
27/5/22
3,626
5,043
113
C
I received my KING OP41 in silver the other day after a hassle free transaction with a RWI TD.

Some observations when comparing it to my EWF:
  1. KING and EWF look identical, same hands, dial, case, bezel, lume, etc. nothing is distinctly different even with a loupe
  2. KING (head only) is 62.5 grams, EWF is 59.9 grams, an indistinguishable difference on the wrist
  3. KING movement (rotor) is much quieter than EWF when given a gentle to moderate shake (no bracelet)
  4. KING stem tube threads have better engagement than EWF but they're much rougher, the machining is poor - they will probably bed in with use but cross-threading is a real risk
  5. KING crown has much, much sharper beveled edges than EWF, easier to grip but feels far less premium than EWF
  6. KING winding feels rougher than EWF but at the same time less fragile
  7. KING has disconcerting feedback when fully wound but EWF feels like it might break at any time
  8. KING (mine) keeps better time than (my) EWF... KING is about +5s per day, EWF is about +15s per day
So, the KING is not the revelation over the EWF I was hoping it might be but it does feel mechanically more sound, even if the finishing is a little worse.

My only disappointment is that I can't get my EWF Jubilee bracelet to properly engage with the KING head, it's a bit strange because the KING Oyster bracelet mates perfectly to the EWF head with no obvious (under loupe) EL gaps... the springbar alignment must be 0.?mm out but I can't see where/how and i don't know how to fix this. It's a pity because I think the basic Rolex Oyster bracelet (reps) suck and also don't even look that good.
Very helpful! I have an EWF and sounds like the upgrade may not be the upgrade we were hoping for. At least not me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockdaytona

PTwatchLover

Active Member
Certified
29/8/22
318
1,175
93
Portugal
I'm really enjoying this simple and minimalistic watch.

3ofWmn.jpg

3oT7UW.jpg
 
Last edited: