From the QC it looks very close to the genuine.. I have the gen for two years now, I have purchased all gen POs and I feel the 2500 case with the uniqueness of the ceramic insert and dial make the most beautiful and comfortable PO out there.. plus the rarity factor!
Here some gen pics for your reference
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
can i just ask, coz from the pictures i have seen of the gen, the bezel numerals and markers as well as the ring around the glass, they seem to have a brushed steel look, somewhat textured, where as the rep bezel numerals, marker and ring have a more mirror like look. is there a diffrence? is the bracelet of the v6 close to gen? thanks
can i just ask, coz from the pictures i have seen of the gen, the bezel numerals and markers as well as the ring around the glass, they seem to have a brushed steel look, somewhat textured, where as the rep bezel numerals, marker and ring have a more mirror like look. is there a diffrence? is the bracelet of the v6 close to gen? thanks
Looking at the QC pics, it's clear a super rep if you change the date disc. The rep has the wrong 8500 po date disc.
If you do that and put a gen 2500 movt even Omega AD won't know the difference.
Where did i get the right Date Disk
Anybody have one in hand yet?
Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk
I agree, the metal rim of the pearls looks too fat. But this should be easy to exchange for better one.
But i will wait until i have it in my hands. In real life everything looks much better than on pics.
I think i eont be the first one to receive it, because it has to travel a safe route to my country, so i am looking forward to some daylight-pics from another member.
Btw +1 on the datewheel, have been searching a bit but all i could find for 2892 was white on black. If anybody knows a source...