Omega Noob LMPO V6 is out. Time to be a super rep.

[k4jun]

I dropped my omf order, only reason I considered it was because of ceramic dial. But now noob has come through so Id prefer that.

Also pearl on omf looks horrible. Rest all is acceptable



Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

OMF V2 DW is fantasy too, it tried to mimic the omega 2500c calibre font but the shape of the numbers is not always correct, they are too squared.
It is beyond me what OMF is doing with their DWs. On the market there are ready DWs with the correct font, but OMF still prefers to develop the own disc, pity they failed with both discs.

 

[ericb196]

Just curious. What sort of bezels have been installed on rep watches so far? Are they not ceramic?

It's for me the first Noob version with a ceramic dial and for me on this watch this polished ceramic dial makes the difference !!

 

[Alexccmeister]

It's for me the first Noob version with a ceramic dial and for me on this watch this polished ceramic dial makes the difference !!

I see. Thanks for clearing that up.

 

[VIV54]

I see. Thanks for clearing that up.

Mate you confused. I did too at first when OMF came out, I read ceramic dial but I thought ceramic insert lol. It's the dial that is also made of ceramic so it gives it different shades in different light conditions., from black to grey to blueish. Compared to the crpo it is really shiny and the combination with the liquidmetal insert is nice.

 

[Alexccmeister]

Haha now I get it.

 

[Lagunax]

I like the datewheel font!

Finally - red tipped second hand instead of orange.

Double AR.

No mods really needed other than waterproofing!

 

[Drifter]

I like the datewheel font!

Finally - red tipped second hand instead of orange.

Double AR.

No mods really needed other than waterproofing!

Most importantly ceramic dial which now looks great.

Earlier noob version were fine but the dial was the biggest let down notwithstanding seconds hand tip which was fairly easy to mod.



Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

 

[Therion666]

It says that it's made by V6F on Chazingtime:

https://chazingtime04.co/products/s...d-edition-1948-lmpo-v6f-11-best-edition-a2892

​​​​​​???

 

[C Master]

Hmmm I might need another one. I have had a lot of issues with the crown on my V2.

 

[merowinger]

I think that chazingtime is wrong.
It's V6 from Noob...not V6-factory .
Just a guess.

 

[Therion666]

Check out the date ( 6 ) on a gen:

https://www.google.si/amp/s/forums....-limited-edition-3180186.html?t=3180186&amp=1

And the 6 on the new Noob:

https://www.intime03.co/omega/5664-...al-on-ss-bracelet-a2892-free-nylon-strap.html

I wish they could do EVERYTHING right, just once FFS...

 

[slashFAslash]

Mate, yet I did not even receive my v6 no idea whether there will be another v.
Gen Eta DW costs $10-15 so should not be a big problem for those who want it be super gen correct.

So the genuine Eta datewheel is the same in the Gen LMPO? If so then any modder could swap it in yeah.

 

[sharp3r]

Looks great, is this the best rep of a Omega LMPO out there currenty? Never ordered from InTime are the prices in Euro or USD?

 

[Thatwatchguy]

6 is definitely off!

 

[ZoomBoy]

Check out the date ( 6 ) on a gen:

https://www.google.si/amp/s/forums.w...0186%26amp%3D1

And the 6 on the new Noob:

https://www.intime03.co/omega/5664-p...lon-strap.html

I wish they could do EVERYTHING right, just once FFS...

For a second there I thought you meant on the dial.

 

[Therion666]

It's not a problem, if the generic ETA datewheel has the same font as the gen LMPO. Any watchsmith can fix that for pennies. But is it in fact the same?

Did they have the correct datewheel font on previous "Vs"?

 

[k4jun]

Not the same.
Gen omega 2500 DW has white and flat font, like many ETA disks.
Gen omega 8500 DW has silver and raised font.
Gen LMPO DW has a layout of 2500 font but it is silver and raised.

 

[jttou]

It's not a problem, if the generic ETA datewheel has the same font as the gen LMPO. Any watchsmith can fix that for pennies. But is it in fact the same?

Did they have the correct datewheel font on previous "Vs"?

You seem to be expecting a perfect, exact rep of the gen but all for rep money, maybe lower your expectations or go gen.

 

[obrienk]

You seem to be expecting a perfect, exact rep of the gen but all for rep money, maybe lower your expectations or go gen.

Whilst I agree with you, it’s a bit frustrating when they introduce a flaw that they’d previously got right.

 

[leo6929]

It´s just not to be expected to take a step back when it was done right in the previous version.... wtf?