.... but may be it is the Italian version of the dial :hehehe:
Why deny the evidence? I invite you to visit Rolex.com and you will realize that the pic of the dial I posted is that of a 116500.
.... but may be it is the Italian version of the dial :hehehe:
What do you think about this dial?
Looks like an ARF dial to me, due to the thick rim around the border of the dial. This is the part your modder has to shave of by 1mm to make it fit the SA4130 (besides clipping the feet).
Yeah bro, it’s a V2 ARF dial, have correct subdial?
The font used on Rolex’s website is WRONG. Check out any pic you can of actual 116500s, not renderings. That font was never used on ceramic daytonas.
....I’ve seen enough of them
What do you think about this dial?
It is an ARF dial with the correct Sub-dial thickness.
Some had Sub-dials that were slightly thinner than Gen and some had Sub-dials that were the same thickness as Gen.
Please, if you don't know what you are talking about, just don't talk.
If you already reached your truth, there is no reason to ask for other people's point of view.
Just know that you are wrong, the font is not correct.
Just Got my V4 but it looks like ceramic ring is not matching?
"60" in the ring not matching the center of crown.