I don’t disagree, but it would be nice if the aforementioned user making the comparison actually had some proof of this. Other than providing an opinion saying it’s flawed. That doesn’t add value to the thread.
If he showed a picture of previous V4 sub dials, or even his perfect subdial’s compared to
ricciox ‘s pictures, clearing showing the sub dial thickness difference, I wouldn’t of chimed in. I think that is why
ricciox was annoyed to begin with that another member is claiming there’s a flaw with his watch just because he swing something with his eyes. I have better things to do than argue with people on the internet unlike others.
Anyways I’m not going to argue with the person, I don’t want to get off topic but just my 2 cents. If you are saying someone’s watch is flawed, a little proof to back it up would be nice, other than some “experts” opinion.