Noob V4 Daytona's

[gb7007]

 

[Bobi01]

Not genlike but looks amazing bro

 

[gb7007]

Not genlike but looks amazing bro

Noob V4, Prof AR crystal, gen spec gasket, CF bezel

 

[Dizzy]

I had prof double AR on my old daytona. Looked awesome but it’s far from Gen. I might try single side AR on my new one. That might be a happy medium.

 

[ssouthall6]

Vrf have just released a bunch of 7750 daytonas. I only had a quick look but aside from terrible rehaut and sell, the dial actually isn't terrible - probably better than noob


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Bobi01]

Vrf have just released a bunch of 7750 daytonas. I only had a quick look but aside from terrible rehaut and sell, the dial actually isn't terrible - probably better than noob


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You can say that arf is better than noob and someone think that arf is better and someone says that noob is better (imo noob is very very good now and imo only visual flaw is font O in rolex,everything else is genlike from color to subdials and markers) but bro dont get me wrong this is horrible dial compared to both noob and arf
bad print,bad subdials bad markers tottaly wrong

 

[ricciox]

hi, this time also thanks to the opinion of a friend I confirmed the photos qc.

 

[Mark1937]

hi, this time also thanks to the opinion of a friend I confirmed the photos qc.

Counters too much fat! :-(
...hope are only ugly pics

 

[ricciox]

Counters too much fat! :-(
...hope are only ugly pics

look at this photo compared to the gen, it looks good to me.

 

[2841]

Mark is right, the sub dials looks to fat now

 

[shel504]

Mark is right, the sub dials looks to fat now

Well, this isn't the Noob V4 right? It's the new product from VRF. But definitely too fat.

 

[2841]

Well, this isn't the Noob V4 right? It's the new product from VRF. But definitely too fat.

Nope, that’s a v4. The VRF looks very different (Horrible bad in every aspect)

 

[shel504]

Nope, that’s a v4. The VRF looks very different (Horrible bad in every aspect)

Damn, subdials put on some weight over the holidays. Glad I got one when they were slimmer.

 

[2841]

Damn, subdials put on some weight over the holidays. Glad I got one when they were slimmer.

It’s not the first time noob takes a step back, probably won’t be the last time either

 

[ricciox]

guys for me they are the same, the angle of the photo is different, a friend of mine made a comparison with gen and they are identical yes subdial.

 

[Tony Clifton]

The VRF dials are horrible. For example the Daytona writing over the 6 o'clock subdial uses the wrong font of the 116520 (the "A" has this Serif shape). I know that in real life no one would notice but I know most guys here including me are super anal about These Kind of Things..

 

[shel504]

guys for me they are the same, the angle of the photo is different, a friend of mine made a comparison with gen and they are identical yes subdial.

Look at the left subdial on both and move your eyes back and forth between the two side by side pics. Look for the increased thickness of the outside black between the top of the 9 and the edge of the subdial.

 

[ricciox]

I already understood what you mean, but I repeat it will be the different position of the photos that will make them appear different, live compared to the gen we have not noticed differences in subdial measurements.

 

[2841]

guys for me they are the same, the angle of the photo is different, a friend of mine made a comparison with gen and they are identical yes subdial.

All that matters is, that you like it

 

[ricciox]

what I don't like and that people judge from a simple photo and insists, I am convinced that some of them do not have a personal gen, instead I repeat, I speak because I have seen live the comparison between v4 and gen and we were 3, the only difference we noticed with the gen is the red rolex writing a little clearer.