- 30/7/16
- 2,692
- 1,055
- 0
The gen does have a yellowish tint. These look fine imho.
Yeah I suspected that. Too white lume does look weird and is one of the most obvious flaws on Rolex reps IMHO.
Last edited:
The gen does have a yellowish tint. These look fine imho.
Gen for comparison. Looks a little yellow. I think it's really a niche personal taste whether absolute white or the smallest hue of yellow is a deal breaker.Yeah I suspected that. Too white lume does look weird and is one of the most pbvious flaws on Rolex reps IMHO.
My QC looks similar
I am presuming lighting plays a factor.
Unless there's someone with a VSF from Li that has a noticeably whiter indice, it can't be denoted that there is an issue with the lume itself.
You're right about the markers. It could also be the angle.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
Indeed, the movement seemed in excellent condition and the alignment was perfect. It was too good to pass!I have already asked for better pics, and better lighting, it doesn't look bad but just want to be sure it is not the yellow lume issue. Did you accept yours?
I dont notice even the slightest bit of yellow in my watchThe gen does have a yellowish tint. These look fine imho.
I dont notice even the slightest bit of yellow in my watch
Sent from my SM-N970U1 using Tapatalk
Absolutely good sir! Li has yet to give me tracking, it's taking way longer than usual. Must be all the heavy flow of sales.kennygconspiracy and bgreg
Would appreciate it much if you could both post photos of the reps when you receive them, so we can compare to your QC photos. Thanks!
Do you still have the original QC photos?
The gen does have a yellowish tint. These look fine imho.
I’ve owned 2 of the gen and neither were yellow in full daylight! Yes when you were inside there was residual effect of the charged lume but outdoors they were crisp white. Had the black and the grey dial versions.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I’ve owned 2 of the gen and neither were yellow in full daylight! Yes when you were inside there was residual effect of the charged lume but outdoors they were crisp white. Had the black and the grey dial versions.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It could be the light ! I saw the gen a week ago, specifically after the yellow lume posts and it was not crisp white in my opinion. There is a difference between daylight and artificial light source. Either way, we need more QC pics in order to judge this.
If anyone had a chance to post gen vs rep on the same picture it would be king. But it will probably be a while before that happens since it was just released. In any case I like this rep a lot judging from the pictures. My fingers are itching.
It wouldn't help with the lume issue because there are plenty of reps that don't have the yellow lume problem. It's a batch issue. Show a rep in a photo with gen and both have good lume but that doesn't rule out those that have gotten one from a bad batch.
How can you be sure there even is a problem without comparison? And who told you only this batch looks like it does? There are plenty of reps that have a too white lume problem which is very obvious IMO.
Because it has been thoroughly documented at this point.
Look at my two posts here for further information:
https://forum.replica-watch.info/for...87#post8106187
https://forum.replica-watch.info/for...75#post8107075
Look at the photos. Something is clearly wrong and most reps of VSF don't have that but quite a few people do.
And a reddit user stated he took his rep to the AD and it was not as white as gen.