KushBandit
I'm Pretty Popular
Only if it's gen spec. Rep dials don't always fit gen Rolex cases, and vice-versa.If the reps fit rolex (thwy do) and this is a rolex fit then the concusion would be yes
Only if it's gen spec. Rep dials don't always fit gen Rolex cases, and vice-versa.If the reps fit rolex (thwy do) and this is a rolex fit then the concusion would be yes
Well said .. well better than how I said itOnly if it's gen spec. Rep dials don't always fit gen Rolex cases, and vice-versa.
Only if it's gen spec. Rep dials don't always fit gen Rolex cases, and vice-versa.
The rep dials are larger and does not fit gen cases. The gen dial fits rep cases but the other way around does not work. I've learned it the hard way ...If the reps fit rolex (thwy do) and this is a rolex fit then the concusion would be yes
Regarding that I remember finding on RWI a rehaut construction diagram (not the @p0pperini one ). I was pretty sure that I saved it somewhere but no. Does someone still have it somewhere? It compared gen/JF/TC construction and explained why JF dial couldn't fit Gen case.If i remember correctly JF/ARF are wider than gen dial and won't fit a gen spec 16610
Here you can see the gen case construction in a simplified way.
Here is how ARF/JF and TC has done it,
Hence the dial will not fit the ST case as that is gen construction.
IMO, reason for how some rep factories made cases like this is so the dial will sit flush against the rehaut, as it will be pushed right into it. However on the gen the movement will be pushed on the 27.5mm step and the dial will not touch the rehaut in any way.
I checked a month or two ago and also no stock at ST. Have they discontinued the case, anyone have info on that?
That's a Startime case. I think he meant to say the CGs are stumpy (meaning short). The lugs have a different problem - they are way wide (fat).What case do you have pictured here?
It’s a startime thx @KJ2020 but note the case you’re showing is a later no hole case. ST is based on an L serial case so check out earlier cases that do have fatter lugs. Still needs work but not quite as bad.What case do you have pictured here?
Interesting bro, I never read about or saw that there were different lug widths (or different CGs) over the years of 16610s or 16710s.It’s a startime thx @KJ2020 but note the case you’re showing is a later no hole case. ST is based on an L serial case so check out earlier cases that do have fatter lugs. Still needs work but not quite as bad.