From intimes pics the lugs look to be slightly longer giving the SEL a more gen like recess at the tip of the lug. Cleans are almost flush
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes I spotted that too. The lugs look a lot better. The crown guards also look better. I'm looking forward to seeing more pictures before calling this though!From intimes pics the lugs look to be slightly longer giving the SEL a more gen like recess at the tip of the lug. Cleans are almost flush
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What's up with the chrono? Minutes on chrono are almost half an hour in but hour hand hasn't moved at all. AFAIK on noob it's moving even before hitting 30mins exactly
I think clean is better overall still. The rehualt engraving and overall qc is better. The only thing is the crown and case back teeth win on BT.
the only stupid thing that i dont like on clean is that they marked “clean” on their bezel and back of the dial. If they but a rolex logo on the watch they are reping a rolex. Why wouldnt they put rolex logo on the back of bezel or dial. That just stupid. U might say they sont want the watch to pass as gen on market. But rep watch is illegal anyways. Just doesnt make sense to me
intime, jtime, trusty, puretime, everyone recommends Clean to me better, so I don't know what to do... because if several TDs recommend Clean, it must be for a reason...
The one on 116519 is very obvious on gen . But i dont really see it that much on panda. Damn it makes me want to buy a BT just to look at what its like. Lol
Gen has shiny outer ring to the subdials. It's something neither noob nor arf quite got right.
Sent from my KB2003 using Tapatalk
Interesting. But I would like to know what specifically is better and for which dial (white or black). Is it strictly the dial they say clean is better or is it other factors (case, hands, bezel, etc). Movement is the same for both factories so it doesn't matter.
Please u can post photo with blog clean on back of the dial and bezel please?
I talked to them about the panda, they say that the bezel and bracelet dial is very good for BT, but that in general rules CF is better
My humble opinion, BTF makes a better black dial than CF. Also what concerns me are issues with CF (aside from the sub dials are not as thin as gen) is the crown falling off and other issues with the pushers. That's why I believe BTF makes a better Daytona. Again... my humble opinion.
Given that the BTF is completely new and that no one has had it in hands, there's therefore no way to assess yet whether quality is good, or whether they'll have falling crowns, issues with pushers or any other issues.
So we may want to wait a bit before saying it's better or worse than CF
Well some have claimed that BTF is 3KF reincarnated and that 3KF had a good reputation when they were operating.