NEW RELEASE BT/BETTER FACTORY DAYTONA 116500

[Ac1013]

 

[mmaggi]

Sub dials on the BTF black dial appear to be slightly thinner than what we've seen from CF. Panda's sub dials from BTF look pretty good to gen.

 

[Hidenjoy]

 

[mmaggi]

InTime's website pics are pretty good. https://www.intime06.co/rollie/8428...dial-on-904l-ss-case-and-bracelet-sa4130.html

Although the sub dials are slightly slimmer to CF, they're still no where near as good as BTF's panda.

 

[Hidenjoy]

InTime's website pics are pretty good. https://www.intime06.co/rollie/8428...dial-on-904l-ss-case-and-bracelet-sa4130.html

Although the sub dials are slightly slimmer to CF, they're still no where near as good as BTF's panda.

I think the inner sub dial are too relief
Sit too high. Not same height with subdial

 

[gilrob]

It's nice to know that the clone movement is available to more than one factory.

 

[alilondon]

So which do we prefer bt or CF?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[javicc]

So which do we prefer bt or CF?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

good question! it seems that BT

 

[cjt202020]

Looks great. Will the BT 116520 follow on soon?

 

[Ac1013]

I think clean is better overall still. The rehualt engraving and overall qc is better. The only thing is the crown and case back teeth win on BT.
the only stupid thing that i dont like on clean is that they marked “clean” on their bezel and back of the dial. If they but a rolex logo on the watch they are reping a rolex. Why wouldnt they put rolex logo on the back of bezel or dial. That just stupid. U might say they sont want the watch to pass as gen on market. But rep watch is illegal anyways. Just doesnt make sense to me

 

[javicc]

I think clean is better overall still. The rehualt engraving and overall qc is better. The only thing is the crown and case back teeth win on BT.
the only stupid thing that i dont like on clean is that they marked “clean” on their bezel and back of the dial. If they but a rolex logo on the watch they are reping a rolex. Why wouldnt they put rolex logo on the back of bezel or dial. That just stupid. U might say they sont want the watch to pass as gen on market. But rep watch is illegal anyways. Just doesnt make sense to me

What? I have not seen that.. could you put a photo? Thank you

 

[mmaggi]

I think clean is better overall still. The rehualt engraving and overall qc is better. The only thing is the crown and case back teeth win on BT.
the only stupid thing that i dont like on clean is that they marked “clean” on their bezel and back of the dial. If they but a rolex logo on the watch they are reping a rolex. Why wouldnt they put rolex logo on the back of bezel or dial. That just stupid. U might say they sont want the watch to pass as gen on market. But rep watch is illegal anyways. Just doesnt make sense to me

Where on the dial is "clean" marked? I don't see it on the front of the dial. It must be on the back of dial. If that's the case, I don't think many will care.

 

[Fervid]

He clearly stated it's marked on the back of the dial.

 

[Wacht]

Perhaps they marked it to steer clear from any heat drawn by somebody trying to sell as gen? Rumors back a while said vsf was raided hard because this reason...

 

[rockdaytona]

[url=https://clickpix.org/image/jRYcVY][

does the BT panda look to be the same “shock white” as CF?

 

[mmaggi]

He clearly stated it's marked on the back of the dial.

My apologies. I misread.

 

[H3096]

It would be great to see a real comparison between CF and BT.

 

[doctor-g]

"Scratch-proof sapphire crystal with semi-invisible crown etched at 6:00 position of the crystal (same as genuine and this is the first of its kind, one revolutionary breakthrough of the Rolex replicas)"

as intime states

 

[Hidenjoy]

No QC yet ??? Strange… BT is looking better than CF

 

[p0pperini]

the only stupid thing that i dont like on clean is that they marked “clean” on their bezel and back of the dial. If they but a rolex logo on the watch they are reping a rolex. Why wouldnt they put rolex logo on the back of bezel or dial. That just stupid.

Hmm. The uncharitable conclusion to be drawn from a complaint like this is that the person complaining is annoyed because they won’t be able to pass off their rep parts as gen. Why else would anyone complain about markings that will never be seen?

But hey, I’m not cynical or uncharitable - so let’s assume this complaint is because of all those really picky people we all come across, who won’t believe we’re wearing a gen Rolex unless we disassemble it in front of them and show them all the hidden logos.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk