New Portuguese 7 days

[rhc22]

Of course, there is no need for debate. I understand that there was a room for different interpretation of the statement by Ryan.

I was merely meaning to convey mine as reading the context of the statement would indicate the intention, not trying to marginalise different opinion.

Pardon me if I came across that way.

Anyway, as you've said, when the actual rep hits the store, all our questions will be answered and our wallets will dry out. ;-)

You did not come across in anyway that offended me. I hadn't seen Ryans post and that puts a different spin on it.
I think we are all eagerly anticipating this release and we all want it to be bang on.
As you say there will be some empty wallets, mine included

 

[Kleen]

God, I can't wait for this...

 

[prtscn]

Hopefully we won't have to wait till v3.. or even v7 to get a good rep

 

[Ruski91]

Ryan has just confirmed my beliefs:

Sorry all, my mistake :doh:, ZF sent his gen dial pictures to me by mistake but the final rep dial is still improving , stay tuned.

Lets home since they have the gen, it will be damn close.

 

[turpissima]

Ryan has just confirmed my beliefs:



Lets home since they have the gen, it will be damn close.

Haha..it was too good to be true. Maybe in 1-2 years we really can't tell the difference.

 

[PAM2009]

5+ PR is real or not?

Thanks in advance

 

[turpissima]

5+ PR is real or not?

Thanks in advance

I read in some thread it's more like 3 days+. It's the YL Version, but it has the same movement.

 

[higginsd]

Quiet disappointing. I still trust Ryan, he was also a bit frauded by the factory/maker. But I think now, if they say "Good morning!" to you - you'd better check the daylight and your watch, it's possibly midnight...

 

[rhc22]

Haha..it was too good to be true. Maybe in 1-2 years we really can't tell the difference.

The trouble is as I have seen with IWC reps that with each version they correct something but get something that was good wrong so you have a new version with a new errror that wasn't there before.

 

[maichel]

No no no there shouldn't be any line over DAYS writing....

 

[rhc22]

No no no there shouldn't be any line over DAYS writing....

??? I think it is established that it was a gen dial

 

[maichel]

??? I think it is established that it was a gen dial

Thake a look please at the very first post pictures

 

[rhc22]

Thake a look please at the very first post pictures

Sorry don't see what you mean, in the second image you can see the shadow of the recess of the sub dial?

 

[maichel]

Over the writing DAYS in the PR sector the gen has no circle, no solid line... this is what I mean

 

[maichel]

Sorry don't see what you mean, in the second image you can see the shadow of the recess of the sub dial?

Yes in the gen it looks like the shadow of the recess of the sub dial, this rep dial looks to me ad it has a solid line drawn on it

 

[wooky492]

Thake a look please at the very first post pictures

your comment has been made numerous times over and over in the last several pages and in other posts.

and i believe the error has been conveyed to the maker already

 

[wooky492]

The trouble is as I have seen with IWC reps that with each version they correct something but get something that was good wrong so you have a new version with a new errror that wasn't there before.

haha .. just like MS Windows ;-)

 

[svbezooyen]

:laugh:

 

[marco schaffhausen]

They are indeed making a blue faced one. Have seen the pictures already.

but the one with the blue dial was never manufactured by IWC...

 

[wooky492]

but the one with the blue dial was never manufactured by IWC...

They did make blue dial.. limited edition Laureus

But yes you are right, it was never done in regular production. Only Black, Grey, White dials.