- 18/12/09
- 2,606
- 1,876
- 113
I know, I mean, check the QC image carefully
May I ask, the hell are you talking about, mate? This is a replica forum, perhaps you would enjoy more other sites instead?
I know, I mean, check the QC image carefully
If you want that more accurate, i give you this.
No offense
This line made me laugh my ass off. Thank you
BreakYourUglyFace If I may ask, what does that mean, that "Dog" or "DOG" thing. Is this a normal thing to say where you live.
I would like to know because in the EU we learn English and the word Dog is used when we mean your animal, you know, the mens best friend, or it is used in a insulting way. you know, when you wanna insult someone.
But the same could be said about the word "Fuck" We learn not to use it, but when I was in NY everybody uses the F word.
So what I would like to know is: What is the meaning of the word Dog, when you use it? Just learning. Thx in advance.
I know, I mean, check the QC image carefully
While I agree with you BIONONE on the whole post, I would not say PF is mediocre. Up until today they still have the best blue dial Nautilus, if you swap the datewheel for the RWI custom one.
Lol, you’re welcome. I’m glad people have a sense of humor. It seems like way too many members took our stories (mine and Darude’s) seriously, instead of understanding that it was just commentary about the ridiculousness of complaining about the 0.3mm difference.
I received my tracking number yesterday, and should have my photos and review complete shortly.
To be honest, coming from the Rolex rep scene I can tell you this is a walk in the park compared to that. Anyone releases a new nice Submariner and you have all sorts of "experts" tearing the watch apart...
I received my QC pictures and i have some questions...
First, please, confirm me that is the PPF model, as i see the writting and the crown seems to be PPF but im not an expert in PP models.
Second, my biggest afraid with that was the alignement of 12h and 9h. I have been reading about QC issues with this factory, but i think that they are pretty fine.
Third, i just wanted to share it to increase our knowledge and to show to other people this new model????
http://imgur.com/a/kUKPPXg
I find the Patek community, while smaller, is a bit more realistic
This has happened several times lately, and I must admit it's one of the things that sometimes holds me off from posting full reviews or even wristshots in specific threads (the "What XXXXX are you wearing today?" are fine, as there's only positive views in those). But you are right, it seems like this threads tend to crawl into a contest of who can spot more flaws, which is quite a dick move, in a replica forum.
On the other hand, if you have been long enough in this hobby then you know that people come and go, and you surely know how to tell which opinion is valid and which one is not. I tend to completely dismiss 99% of these comments as I don't care at all. I still look at my wrist and see my (allegedly) subpar DJF Datejust and think it's a gorgeous watch, you know?
(and if you can't bear the weight of wearing that super 8.83mm thick PPF Nautilus with apocalyptically misaligned markers you are getting, maybe you can put it in a box with your GMT 6542 and send it my way, I will give them all the love they deserve... ;-P )