Time_Wizard
Renowned Member
It's the next level stuff. Why innovate when you can copy a copy of a copy?
:itchyandscratchy:
one day the aftermarket prices of VSF reps will go to the moon
Last edited:
It's the next level stuff. Why innovate when you can copy a copy of a copy?
:itchyandscratchy:
one day the aftermarket prices of VSF reps will go to the moon.:
Chrono24![]()
Maybe I will try to list my noob Daytona there it has a matching serial number card LOL…………..
hahhah comes with full papers.
Its funny to speak about this but honestly this shitty behavior is one of the reasons why VSF was hit so bad. Stupid people just tried to sell their VSF watches as GENs and scamming the buyers.
One question: WHERE IS THE NO DATE?
https://trustytime.io/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1_7&products_id=23308
Looks good. I wonder what the number on the inside of the clasp is ... ? If it's1LD, I'd buy one !
Bad xtal/cyclop.
I need to put glasses on if I wanted to read the date. Haha ! The bracelet is the thing with these watches now. It seems the last batch of VSF 126610s has a cheapo bracelet. So if this new watch has an ARF bracelet, I'm in. At least, that's the conclusion I've come to after reading all sorts of threads over the last 6 months or so. Hey, I could be wrong ....
You're confusing the 116610 and 126610 bracelets, ARF has no 126610 bracelets and 1LD is the clasp code on their ZZF/Clean 116610 bracelets
I stand corrected. I wonder what the code on the "good" VSF 126610 bracelets was then ? Because there are numerous posts saying that the last batch seemed to come with inferior bracelets. One of the terms posted was "lightweight" if I remember correctly. 3VV is one that was mentioned recently as being bad ... but then again, that might be for the 116610 and not the 126610 ?
But here's the thing, we can all get caught up in nitpicking reps (like I feel I've just done now), that we spend our time antagonizing over tiny flaws that can barely be seen by the naked eye. But the weight of a watch on your wrist is not something you can overlook. I was literally a day away from paying for a Clean 116610LN when this thread appeared. I asked the TD if he knew anything about it and he did not. So I've decided to wait. Hopefully someone will buy one and post a review of it on here. One can only hope. Ha, maybe it'll be me !
I stand corrected. I wonder what the code on the "good" VSF 126610 bracelets was then ? Because there are numerous posts saying that the last batch seemed to come with inferior bracelets. One of the terms posted was "lightweight" if I remember correctly. 3VV is one that was mentioned recently as being bad ... but then again, that might be for the 116610 and not the 126610 ?
But here's the thing, we can all get caught up in nitpicking reps (like I feel I've just done now), that we spend our time antagonizing over tiny flaws that can barely be seen by the naked eye. But the weight of a watch on your wrist is not something you can overlook. I was literally a day away from paying for a Clean 116610LN when this thread appeared. I asked the TD if he knew anything about it and he did not. So I've decided to wait. Hopefully someone will buy one and post a review of it on here. One can only hope. Ha, maybe it'll be me !
3VV is the newest VSF 126610 clasp code, but haven't read any reviews about it yet. H7Z was the first and 1LQ was the updated and i think it was considered the better one.
If the bracelet is one of your most important criterias then your best option at the moment will be the Clean sub but that's the 116 sub.
The bracelet of this release, at least from the pics, looks very good imo. Nicely polished, no gaps and very good looking clasp but as you said nobody has held it in hands yet. So if you buy it please make a review, i'm curious for it
![]()