New C+ Factory Pepsi

[2fast4lust]

Great Iv got the same for mine . Do you know what size gasket you used

Cheers for replying

its a stock gasket

 

[sagewatch]

I noticed the datewheel font is a visibly too thick on the Clean/C+ GMT Masters.

Has anyone had any luck with fixing this? For example, swapping to another date wheel?

 

[VenomGT3]

Just got my C+ Pepsi and C+ Meteoirte Pepsi. I’m not sure why the meteorite one’s insert is sooo damn good and gen like… lol
Clear difference between the regular Pepsi’s tomato red insert

 

[aHero]

The C+ insert does certainly look good. The dial OTOH…

 

[VenomGT3]

The C+ insert does certainly look good. The dial OTOH…

Yeah…. I will look into perhaps another C+ to see if I’d get a better one

 

[aHero]

Yeah…. I will look into perhaps another C+ to see if I’d get a better one

Probably not worth your time. Oascom's dial is the only way to go, IMO.

 

[cjt202020]

The insert looks exactly like Xing

 

[WatchSmith.US]

The insert looks exactly like Xing

Agreed. The coarse background in the engraving looks to Xing. And of course the colors.

 

[chappac]

Just got my C+ Pepsi and C+ Meteoirte Pepsi. I’m not sure why the meteorite one’s insert is sooo damn good and gen like… lol
Clear difference between the regular Pepsi’s tomato red insert

Definitely an Xing Bezel!!! Looks just like mine!!

 

[tictoc1987]

My c+ Pepsi that I received about 1 week ago

 

[Luiki]

Great bezel colour in meteorite. Congratulations!!!!

Acabo de recibir mi C+ Pepsi y C+ Meteoirte Pepsi. No estoy seguro de por qué el inserto del meteorito es tan bueno y tan gen... jajaja
Clara diferencia entre el inserto rojo de tomate normal de Pepsi

 

[Booonin]

Can somebody please share a link on a TD with this watch? cant seem to find c+.

 

[rayrayy]

I think it's ctime that's selling the newer version of the pepsi.

 

[koppy]

Message a few TDs, many can source for you ,

 

[Booonin]

thanks. Its just I think i confused l, c+ and new blro from clean - are two different right?

 

[diamonds]

thanks. Its just I think i confused l, c+ and new blro from clean - are two different right?

Yes, Clean and C+ are seperate factories.
It can be confusing because sometimes people refer to Clean as "CF" (Clean Factory) and C+ as "C+F" (C+ Factory).

 

[Luiki]

thanks. Its just I think i confused l, c+ and new blro from clean - are two different right?

They are different factories. The same watch made by different people, but people say that sometimes they use the same parts.

for example clean uses the dd3235 movement which is newer and they say good things about it (that doesn't mean the C+ is bad), but they also say that clean's glass and bezel movement are worse

 

[big_polarbear]

They are different factories. The same watch made by different people, but people say that sometimes they use the same parts.

for example clean uses the dd3235 movement which is newer and they say good things about it (that doesn't mean the C+ is bad), but they also say that clean's glass and bezel movement are worse

All factories have sub-suppliers and sometimes they share them.

One thing that is really curious though is that C+ used xxxxY2L3 (!!!!!) casesets with the correct serial font (!!!!!), for example here:
https://forum.replica-watch.info/threads/new-c-factory-pepsi.10855528/post-11013925
Here:
https://forum.replica-watch.info/threads/new-c-factory-pepsi.10855528/post-11016630

C+ probably asked their caseset supplier to copy CF, and ended up more correct than CF they tried to replicate

 

[Luiki]

All factories have sub-suppliers and sometimes they share them.

One thing that is really curious though is that C+ used xxxxY2L3 (!!!!!) casesets with the correct serial font (!!!!!), for example here:
https://forum.replica-watch.info/threads/new-c-factory-pepsi.10855528/post-11013925
Here:
https://forum.replica-watch.info/threads/new-c-factory-pepsi.10855528/post-11016630

C+ probably asked their caseset supplier to copy CF, and ended up more correct than CF they tried to replicate

totally agree. It seems that if the GMT is not clean it is not good, and then I see many criticisms of Clean about the bezel and glass. But I have already seen several C+ with similar finishes much superior to Clean.

It seems that having DD3235 is the important thing, and in the end it is just a few more hours of reserve. In my opinion I prefer a well-finished C+ than a Clean with DD3235 and a worse exterior appearance.

 

[big_polarbear]

totally agree. It seems that if the GMT is not clean it is not good, and then I see many criticisms of Clean about the bezel and glass. But I have already seen several C+ with similar finishes much superior to Clean.

It seems that having DD3235 is the important thing, and in the end it is just a few more hours of reserve. In my opinion I prefer a well-finished C+ than a Clean with DD3235 and a worse exterior appearance.

I mean it’s to a point now that all owners of earlier CF DD3285 versions are best off buying the last C+ and do a swap of all the parts they want from the older CF to the newest C+.