id say the Crystal CleAR crystals themselves are on the same quality level as the Profs, Startime, and some of the other generic sapphire crystals you can buy. The difference between prof/CC and those generic ones is the AR coating. The generic ones either dont use AR, or have some really bad AR on them.
as for being gen spec, Crystal CleAR isnt trying to make replica crystals. In fact, they have been adamant that they arent a "Replica Parts Supplier". They are just providing quality sapphire crystals with their AR coatings applied to them.
Like was said, if you want gen spec with a replica LEC and an xtal that is exactly like the gen, Asmodeus has a great solution. They arent really competitors, since Asmo is focusing on one xtal to be exactly like the real deal, and these guys arent. Apples and oranges comparison.
With the difference being prof is using top tier AR coating (may be not suitable for watch applications for numerous reasons) while CC is using the cheapest optician grade AR.
It is a fact.
It is a fact.
Do you have an article about being Auto finance manager? You should be able to tell about quality job in your own field right?Where have you read this? Do you have an article
Or information for us to read?
Sent from the RWI mobile app
Do you have an article about being Auto finance manager? You should be able to tell about quality job in your own field right?
No attitude, I am just trying to explain why the above request was not the proper one. So if you want to verify it yourself you can ask prof, if you consider prof a competitor and not being neutral, you can ask another member here that is in AR field such as @Sonil , if you still consider anyone here not neutral ask your local optician.Correct. No need to have an attitude bro. I’m asking cause I’m curious
Sent from my iPhone using RWI
Do you have an article about being Auto finance manager? You should be able to tell about quality job in your own field right?
Quality is semantics. Synthetic sapphirenks synthetic sapphire. It's like saying a cubic zirconia is better from Zales than from Kay's. The cut does definitely matter as does the AR and the magI'll describe it with a generic term, "shape", "quality", "treatment". I can't measure the thickness by looking at a picture.
I wasn't aware you have spoken wth crystal cleAR regarding their AR choices. I speak with them often being local and they've said they've never spoken to anyone on the phone about the xtals yet. You seem too eager to shut them down. If you were more honest it would regarded with more credibility. Like when you said you'd send me your prototype and I said I'd do a comparison between cc prof and yours. Then you backed outWith the difference being prof is using top tier AR coating (may be not suitable for watch applications for numerous reasons) while CC is using the cheapest optician grade AR.
People in their own field don't need an article no, but there are quantitative and qualitative things I can point out to show that what I am saying is true. Could you maybe point out or direct us to information that can help us tell what we are looking at because we aren't as experienced as you.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quality is semantics. Synthetic sapphirenks synthetic sapphire. It's like saying a cubic zirconia is better from Zales than from Kay's. The cut does definitely matter as does the AR and the mag
Sapphirenor mineral glass on your way old PO?id have to disagree with you here , my way old 42PO dssd has a sapph on it and the thing looks milky in the sunlight , close examination shows microbubbles , or voids in the media , the Noobs do not look this way , it has nothing to do with the cut ....
Sapphirenor mineral glass on your way old PO?
I wasn't aware you have spoken wth crystal cleAR regarding their AR choices. I speak with them often being local and they've said they've never spoken to anyone on the phone about the xtals yet. You seem too eager to shut them down. If you were more honest it would regarded with more credibility. Like when you said you'd send me your prototype and I said I'd do a comparison between cc prof and yours. Then you backed out