stefanbejan07
Getting To Know The Place
- 31/1/22
- 18
- 4
- 3
Keep on mind that this is not a photograph but a rendering, and sometimes shades of colours are very different, for example the Rolex Pepsi has very different colours on their website from in real life
Rendered pics are never how the watches look in real life. The rep has a nice dial color and that should be good enough. If you start comparing the reps to the gens you’ll start to find differences sooner or later which may prevent you from enjoying the watch.
Glad that you're happy with it, it's a very nice rep indeed congratsyes, i understand it's a render, i just wanted to point out that a similar shade of blue can be seen on my rep under certain conditions really enjoying this one tho
That’s how I feel too. Years ago, I owned one of the early versions jf 15400 in blue and it looked amazing to me, regardless if it was the right shade or not (as many argued at the time). Kind of regret letting it go. I’m hoping the 26240 blue looks similar to this.Wow, that blue is really nice! Close to gen or not, it's the winner for me
Does this mean you will order one too? I will follow the leader.No matter how close a rep comes it’ll never be gen so you’re right, as long as the wearer can enjoy the watch then that’s the gold standard for reps. The acceptance level for each owner is different and the same watch may wear differently for each person.
For me the provenance and pedigree matter too so it’s simply beyond how accurate the rep is.
Having said all that, this is a watch I will wear on casual days. Like you mentioned it “does it”for me too.
I currently have the gen 26240s in green and the ceramic one. I will have a gen gold 26240 coming in (dial color unknown).Does this mean you will order one too? I will follow the leader.
You need to reject this.
I see the diagonal scratch on the case, I don't see the chips and micro dents.You need to reject this.
It’s the first time I’m seeing defects on the case and those look like actual chips or micro-dents on them.
You’re right about ceramic not supposing to look that way. @BIONONE can I ask if there are different “grades” or types of ceramic used on watches?
I‘m not particularly familiar with the composition of gen ceramic watches or between different brands but purity and particle size of the zirconium oxide powder is crucial to maximize mechanical properties. Less pure forms of the base powder can reduce costs but also (some) advantages of the material itself obviously.You need to reject this.
It’s the first time I’m seeing defects on the case and those look like actual chips or micro-dents on them.
You’re right about ceramic not supposing to look that way. @BIONONE can I ask if there are different “grades” or types of ceramic used on watches?
Could you pls supply a link?Omega has a nice „how its made“ on youtube to visualize the process
Could you pls supply a link?
Thx!
Omega
https://www.youtube[.]com/watch?v=fhE-UWQsw1M
That‘s exactly the one i meant - thanks for your swift action to post it!
It is quite impressive thinking about the effort that goes into a ceramic rep. That we even have the opportunity to buy watches made the same way like shown in the video.
I remember the case of the XF 15707 V2 back in the day which already blew me away quality wise.