• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

NEW 40mm VSF release

Mkempes

Patience you must have my young Padawan
Supporter
Patron
Certified
13/12/23
693
1,213
93
EU
I definetly want to add a PAM to my collection. However I'm not yet ready to spend 4-5k€ for a gen PAM00337.

VSF please help me and make a decent rep with gen-like size!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jossé

mjeong73

Do not accept unsolicited offers
10/7/24
2
0
1
Is there confirmation that this is thicker than gen? I have the 1370 gen and thickness is perfect. where can I get one of these rep?
 

locvs

Active Member
Supporter
Certified
7/12/20
354
341
63
Germany
Is there confirmation that this is thicker than gen? I have the 1370 gen and thickness is perfect. where can I get one of these rep?
With the p9000 clone it is impossible to achieve gen thickness. P9000 is twice as thick as p900. even if they shave some of the caseback thickness, it will still be 1,5-2 mm thicker than gen.

you can contact any TD and ask for hom to source the watch.
 

marcsp2675

Non quantus, sed qualis.
Supporter
Certified
18/2/19
310
153
43
California
I feel the same way. VSF has only been using the "in-house" P.9000 clone movement for its Pams for years. It's a good, solid movement, but at 7.9mm (Gen) it's also quite thick. At 8mm, the Clone movement is very close to the Gen movement. It was also the correct movement for the older models (e.g. 312 or 389).
It was a little more problematic to use this clone for watches with the newer P.9010 movement, which is slightly thinner at 6mm. But the P.900 with its 4.2 mm is the latest example where the P.9000 clone, which is almost twice as thick, is no longer the right choice. Unfortunately, the P.900 has replaced the older P.900X movements in Panerai's newer models.
VSF only produces the P.9000 clone, which is only slightly modified.
To get the newer models right, however, you would need a P.900 clone. Developing this would be very expensive. The question is whether it's worth it. I would say: No!
With the thicker P.900 models (e.g. 1226 or 1288), the difference is not that great and they sell well even with the P.9000 clone. The market for the slimmer models (e.g. all Lumimor Dues) is rather small, so it's probably not worth the effort commercially. What's more, the watches are already on the market and would all have to be completely revised with a future P.900 clone.
I am therefore pessimistic.
Very insightful. Makes a lot of sense. Still sucks, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JayBee0815

Kup1712

Renowned Member
Certified
20/1/21
747
646
93
h3kcmo.jpeg

new 40mm additional release
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChaplinTz

marcsp2675

Non quantus, sed qualis.
Supporter
Certified
18/2/19
310
153
43
California
I’m not usually a fan of white PAM, but that is sharp. Shame the height proportions are off in these models.

Anyone know if there is a 44 rep with this coloring?
 

Kup1712

Renowned Member
Certified
20/1/21
747
646
93
I’m not usually a fan of white PAM, but that is sharp. Shame the height proportions are off in these models.

Anyone know if there is a 44 rep with this coloring?
1314 is the closest and the rep is one of the best from vsf 44mm along with 1312 and 1313
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcsp2675

KOT1917

Respected Member
Section Moderator
26/7/19
3,389
5,501
113
Russian federation
Yes, the thickness will definitely not be appropriate, it will be interesting to see the date window and the texture of the dial. And yes, I hope that this time, VSF will immediately understand that this should not be done with white hands, as was the case with the PAM1314.:)
 

KOT1917

Respected Member
Section Moderator
26/7/19
3,389
5,501
113
Russian federation
At this point they just need to toss in a Hangzhou or Seagull with the small seconds or a modified Miyota to achieve thinness. Gen functions be damned.
The ST2555, which is suitable for the format, has a thickness of 7.4, which is not far from the clone's alternative of 7.9. Miyota 8215, for example, even with a suitable thickness of 5.7, should receive a modification of the constant second transfer by 9, and if I'm not mistaken, the date will have to be moved further from the hands. Apparently, it's not worth it.
 

Reaps

Learning something new everyday....
25/9/22
5,989
16,284
113
I wonder with a little modification if the rotor can be taken off, the case back can be shaved or replaced, and you can achieve a 11mm thickness...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Karbon74

Mkempes

Patience you must have my young Padawan
Supporter
Patron
Certified
13/12/23
693
1,213
93
EU
I wonder with a little modification if the rotor can be taken off, the case back can be shaved or replaced, and you can achieve a 11mm thickness...
The case is fat as a whole.

Don't know if there's a possibility to get a custom case that's thin. Then one could build a PAM718. That doesn't require a modified movement due to the missing sec at 9.
 

Reaps

Learning something new everyday....
25/9/22
5,989
16,284
113
The case is fat as a whole.

Don't know if there's a possibility to get a custom case that's thin. Then one could build a PAM718. That doesn't require a modified movement due to the missing sec at 9.
You can see in picture I posted there's some subtle differences but I appreciate the way VSF did it which is they kept the midcase thinner and added the thickness on the caseback.

If we remove the rotor you can shave off at least 1mm bringing it down. Then maybe some custom work on caseback or something to shave it down.

The P9000 movement has everything on one plate which is annoying to disassemble but it also means there's no additional things to remove and shave off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jossé

Virpag

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
Certified
26/3/13
2,439
539
113
My first 40mm Pam and I hope it’s not too small on my big wrist we shall see
I am hoping for a stainless steel bracelet version besides the ceramic I do not remember VSF releasing
One can hope