Nautilus date wheel project

[Direnfan]

Greeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeat work!! I can’t wait it!!! Respect!!

 

[tosoboso]

Yup, I can confirm that - often times gen Pateks have poor datewheel justification. So I can’t see any issue here, honestly we probably have a better product and for sure more passion than the gen owners.

 

[corleone911]

Sometimes the expectations on reps are higher than the gen really has....

 

[wernki]

Will this also fit the new MKF V5?

 

[Cristobal]

Sh*t..this looks good to me. I’m ready to purchase!!

 

[brane]

Looks awesome, here’s a really quick comparison I was eyeing:

 

[Blue Ocean]

Amazing job guys! How can I order a few?

 

[thrillofhunt]

We need to get the order books open soon!

 

[ODINDMT]

SIR!!! How Do I Order??!!

 

[gilrob]

Will this also fit the new MKF V5?

Latest word from BIONONE is that the DWO is not compatible with the MKF V5.

 

[BIONONE]

Latest word from BIONONE is that the DWO is not compatible with the MKF V5.

Thanks for clarification.

 

[Gbernardi]

I'm interesting in ordering a DW for an Aquanaut 5167 from KMF. Can you confirm your DW will fit this watch? If so, how do I get on the order list?
Thanks

 

[Keylog74]

 

[Keylog74]

 

[tosoboso]

Sir, this looks fantastic! I admire your (and the rest of your team) dedication to this hobby

 

[majwilliams0308]

Oh my goodness.... this is breathtaking!

 

[BIONONE]

I already provided Keylog the file for the thicker font.

As already mentioned we lost some boldness of the numbers during the printing process due to some curious circumstances...

I added the missing thickness to the digital file (compared the native digital file and the print --> then added the difference in boldness to the new digital file)

sooo - hopefully we will soon see a decent DW (even if this is a very nice first attempt while it is still a bit too thin)

 

[mech500]

Great work guys!! Very commendable.

 

[Nivka]

Sorry to be negative, but I think it still looks too thin :/

 

[BIONONE]

Please read my last post