So, before I start, this is my opinion. Not crapping on anyone or anything.
I shared some thoughts on the Supporters only area about my somewhat frustration with ZF and what they're doing to catch up to 3KF in this case.
Those who know, ZF has been doing a very damn good 5167 for years. I've had too many to count. I think 4.
Just a few days ago, I bought from the M2M their latest version, and the seller attached this link:
Andrew quotes on his page the following specs.
Amplitude was in the very low 200's, averaging 215 and the rate was just either -10 or +10. Nothing in between. I hurt my COSC ego that I could not get it even close to +5/-5.
Having dealt with many of these, some will recall my last one having being sold for parts because of ZF's mods to the 9015. Those mods include the shaving of the mainplate's integrated dial spacer to acommodate their very good date-wheel with correct font threw a wrench into what should had been a straight swap.
So, getting those low numbers, I pulled out a brand new 9015 from my stock and went ahead to try to swap the balance complete with bridge. I couldn't.
"what has ZF done now?" I said to myself dumb founded. They literally have moved the balance around. Not only that, they created a brand new balance complete for it. I can hear @KJ2020 say "just one-dip it and oil it bro". I feared the usual "this is probably low quality first attempts by ZF."
On the pictures on Andrew's site, you can see that they used the MY balance complete as the stud carriers are the same as any normal MY9015. Mine weren't like that.
Mine:
"What are you on about?" you guys might ask. I sincerely think that ZF has taken the 9015 to its limit and beyond in the case of the Aquanaut. My last one ran perfectly with the deco plates it had. I just wanted to get a new movement in it.
The case for the 3KF V3. I know that there has been some items with the 3KF that might be of reserve to some. But at this point and after owning one, I cannot see a reason why not to go for a 3KF except the price difference which is not that much considering all the possibilities it brings to the table and other things like:
Yes, there is. It doesn't hack. It doesn't have a hack mechanism per gen. The one thing I do not understand about Patek. But thankfully, I've grown accustomed to it thanks to my Panerai 005.
There is no longer a reason for me to go for the ZF again, unless you really cannot afford the $100-ish difference and you cannot justify it to yourself that the 3KF is better. Yeah, there might be some aesthetic differences, but once you handle both, you'll soon realize you get the $100 extra worth on the 3KF.
If you just want an Aquanaut just because, then sure, get the ZF. Best simile I can do here: The ZF is ARF's attempt at the Daytona, it looks like one but that's pretty much it. Once it craps on you, it craps on you. The 3KF is Clean's attempt at the Daytona, it does a great job being a Daytona and you can do whatever the hell you want with it.
Wristies just three days apart.
ZF:
3KF v3
Look at those numbers!
I shared some thoughts on the Supporters only area about my somewhat frustration with ZF and what they're doing to catch up to 3KF in this case.
Those who know, ZF has been doing a very damn good 5167 for years. I've had too many to count. I think 4.
Just a few days ago, I bought from the M2M their latest version, and the seller attached this link:
PP0291 - Aquanaut Ref.5167 SS/RU Black/Num ZF 1:1 MY9015 Mod [PP0291] - $478.00 : Trusty Time Watch, Your Trusty Watch Shop
Trusty Time Watch PP0291 - Aquanaut Ref.5167 SS/RU Black/Num ZF 1:1 MY9015 Mod [PP0291] - ZF Factory Top Edition Patek Aquanaut 5167 Edition Made 1:1 with a Genuine Patek Aquanaut Ref.5167 Series MOVEMENT: Platinum Plated Miyota 9015 Automatic (28,800bph) Movement with Decorated Bridges/Plates...
trustytime888.io
Andrew quotes on his page the following specs.
As I said before, I've had my fair share of these and thought nothing of it, until I set it on the timegrapher. With the correct MY9015 lift angle, this thing was running like crap and I just wasn't able to regulate it to my taste. Those who know me, know how my tastes in that regard are very anal. It's the one thing I choose to invest my sanity in on this hobby.MOVEMENT: Platinum Plated Miyota 9015 Automatic (28,800bph) Movement with Decorated Bridges/Plates and Gold Plated Rotor with Insignia like Genuine Calibre PP324CS (Only Edition in the market with same position Balance Wheel as per Genuine)
Amplitude was in the very low 200's, averaging 215 and the rate was just either -10 or +10. Nothing in between. I hurt my COSC ego that I could not get it even close to +5/-5.
Having dealt with many of these, some will recall my last one having being sold for parts because of ZF's mods to the 9015. Those mods include the shaving of the mainplate's integrated dial spacer to acommodate their very good date-wheel with correct font threw a wrench into what should had been a straight swap.
So, getting those low numbers, I pulled out a brand new 9015 from my stock and went ahead to try to swap the balance complete with bridge. I couldn't.
"what has ZF done now?" I said to myself dumb founded. They literally have moved the balance around. Not only that, they created a brand new balance complete for it. I can hear @KJ2020 say "just one-dip it and oil it bro". I feared the usual "this is probably low quality first attempts by ZF."
On the pictures on Andrew's site, you can see that they used the MY balance complete as the stud carriers are the same as any normal MY9015. Mine weren't like that.
Mine:
"What are you on about?" you guys might ask. I sincerely think that ZF has taken the 9015 to its limit and beyond in the case of the Aquanaut. My last one ran perfectly with the deco plates it had. I just wanted to get a new movement in it.
The case for the 3KF V3. I know that there has been some items with the 3KF that might be of reserve to some. But at this point and after owning one, I cannot see a reason why not to go for a 3KF except the price difference which is not that much considering all the possibilities it brings to the table and other things like:
- The strap is not half as bad as some make it to be. Yes, the 3KF is a little starchy, but not enough to be uncomfortable. Currently wearing it and I don't feel the watch on my wrist.
- The watch feels better made, more refined.
- The clasp is orgasmic compared to the ZF. The ZF clasp will gap unless you shave a little off the top of the ends and if you do too much, the watch will fly off your wrist. The 3KF one needs no shaving. Just cut and go.
- The clone movement. It took me a minute to regulate into my standards. Lift angle of 0.1 and and +1 s/d.
- The clone movement. You can do so much crap to this. Dials, datewheels, hands.
- The clone movement. Correct case diameters. I thought I wouldn't notice, but I did as soon as I got it on.
Yes, there is. It doesn't hack. It doesn't have a hack mechanism per gen. The one thing I do not understand about Patek. But thankfully, I've grown accustomed to it thanks to my Panerai 005.
There is no longer a reason for me to go for the ZF again, unless you really cannot afford the $100-ish difference and you cannot justify it to yourself that the 3KF is better. Yeah, there might be some aesthetic differences, but once you handle both, you'll soon realize you get the $100 extra worth on the 3KF.
If you just want an Aquanaut just because, then sure, get the ZF. Best simile I can do here: The ZF is ARF's attempt at the Daytona, it looks like one but that's pretty much it. Once it craps on you, it craps on you. The 3KF is Clean's attempt at the Daytona, it does a great job being a Daytona and you can do whatever the hell you want with it.
Wristies just three days apart.
ZF:
3KF v3
Look at those numbers!
Last edited: