drbollocko
I'm Pretty Popular
- 12/11/10
- 1,171
- 22
- 38
Ok, here's what I've gathered:
1) The Zr02 designation apparently was on the first Liquidmetal gen run. The 2012 watch, which I tried on last week does not have that.
2) The 2012 version has a highly polished gloss dial. Available in both Blue and Black. I'm not sure what the first run Liquidmetal Zr02 had, since I've never seen one in the flesh. Also, I'm not sure if the Zr02 had raised numerals.
3) The 2012 version is available in both Chrono and 45mm, but I believe this larger model is only available in blue. I tried all three watches on in the Venice Italy boutique last week. They are fantastic and look a million times better than the regular PO.
4) All the Liquidmetal watches weigh considerably less than their PO counterparts due to the titanium. I'd say that they weigh half as much. It's quite noticeable.
5) Hont's version isn't that far off, but the bezel tick marks are too close to the white inner stripe. They almost touch. Apart from this, and the pearl I'm not sure how far off this rep really is. It's by far their best effort.
Good points bomba, I think there are lots of people mixing up liquid metal releases of the new PO with the ceramic offerings, they are different beasts, the ceramic PO has nothing to do with liquid metal and vice versa. The original 2500 LM PO had a very glossy charcoal coloured dial.
Honts version is pretty good, I have one on the way to have a look at it, you're right the bezel is horrendous, on the flip side the dial is excellent!
...also not sure that the new PO's look a million times better than the old PO's, they certainly look more stunning and striking and have much better attention to detail in finish, the movement is cool also but new omega models are a little more 'blingy' at the same time overall....definitely a more toolish look to the old PO and that is not a bad thing! Both great watches though!