For comparison here's a video of a gen 178240, a 31 mm Rolex with Roman index.
https://youtu.be/hbMLOn2BCe0
To my eyes there are several big differences between the gen and the VR rep shown in the video linked above. First, the gen oyster bracelet has polished center links and on the VR rep the links are all brushed. As noted by the poster above, the rehaut looks too deep as does the case. The gen is 10.4 mm thick and the VR rep is 12.5 per the QC pictures above. The font and the spacing of the words Oyster Perpetual is cramped and just looks off. I could go on, but why pick the watch to death.
I've have purchased about 6 of these 31 mm models made by BP and have to say some are great, almost bang on with great movements and some are not - funky cyclops, cheap movements, etc. I was really hoping for a step up in ladies Rolex reps, but at this point I don't think we've found it with the VR.