KW PAM389 is finally here -------- [ QC pics allowed ] ---------

[tom_cat]

DUE TO THE INTEREST OF THIS REP
QC PICS OF THIS WATCH EITHER ZFac OR KW VERSIONS WILL BE ALLOWED
ALE

Im very excited to see this, what you guys think? from quick look, CG chamfer edges are nicer than ZF, better bezel kurling??

http://www.kuvarsit-watch.com/index.php?dispatch=products.view&product_id=32452

 

[fire007]

looks very nice, I am nit a pam specialist but I vouch for KW quality, cannot wait to read Ale or Mysterio in depth review maybe a future "super rep" grade AAA++ ?

 

[tom_cat]

i can see ceramic bezel minutes ticks are also nicer, i guess i will order soon very very soon

 

[ericb196]

Pearl is really nice too, looks more genuine for me (not from a comparison with the Gen 389 but from a quality point of view)

 

[tom_cat]

Already placed an order, waiting for QC pics

 

[alexanderjs]

Looks better than ZF version, will update with pics when I receive mine.

 

[Norrie]

I'm interested in seeing QCs. In the KW pics, I don't see anything that's better than the ZF.

 

[tom_cat]

wrong post

 

[tom_cat]

the post above doesnt work, here you go, my QC pics which i have already accepted btw

 

[tom_cat]

mods if QC pics not allowed, please delete it, but like i said i have already accepted anyway

 

[fire007]

superb !!! really...

 

[tom_cat]

Thanks mate, I'll post some pics when I get it on my wrists


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[silverclaw]

Is it just me or are KW pearls always too domed? I can appreciate that pearls are incredibly difficult to get right though, so I don't blame them.

 

[ALE7575]

DUE TO THE INTEREST OF THIS REP
QC PICS OF THIS WATCH EITHER ZFac OR KW VERSIONS WILL BE ALLOWED

ALE

 

[slaughterer62]

My god that is a nice version.

opcorn2:

 

[senator]

ZF works for me......

 

[ALE7575]

ZFac is good indeed
But CG, makers, ceramic bezel (and fitting with metallic bezel), Cannon pinion, knurling of the bezel (to be confirmed with QCCpics) are better or way better in KW version

No doubts about that because it is evident

ALE

EDITED: After this post some QC pics of this watch are showing some flaws in KW rep. Please read following posts

 

[Norrie]

Is it just me or are KW pearls always too domed? I can appreciate that pearls are incredibly difficult to get right though, so I don't blame them.

Yep.

 

[tom_cat]

ZFac is good indeed
But CG, makers, ceramic bezel (and fitting with metallic bezel), Cannon pinion, knurling of the bezel (to be confirmed with QCCpics) are better or way better in KW version

No doubts about that because it is evident

ALE

Yeah i agree ALE, the differences are clearly can be seen from the QC pics, i like how tidy are those bezel stick markers too, and CG chamfer edges is clearly better than ZF and for me it is an instant call out right there. However i know pearl is not as flat as gen and somewhat domed shape like silverclaw said but It look nice and do it for me

 

[walkingcloud]

KW is superior.. beautiful qc