"Steel and 18ct yellow gold" ?? LOL
however, it is amazing mate, crystal and reahut are stunning! congratulations
I can not wait to get my with black dial![]()
Yes..."steel and 18ct[emoji16][emoji16][emoji16]
Thank you!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
![]()
Mine arrived today,I have shaved rehaut,remove RRR and change crystal,with a genuine crystal!
Now,for me Watch is Perfect!
What do you think guys?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ok Shotgun!
please confirm
you removed the rolex engraving on the rehaut? AND you lowered the rehaut height by shaving it? so now its thinner? like gen?
and is that the stock band? looks like it has LESS gap between the SEL and first link?
also since you changed the rehaut by removing the engraving ,is the model still correct with the fat hands and blue lume?
Jf might have in mind to build other models for the future even if the case report those words
However I have a question for you friend:
In addition to removing the written RRR reahut it, you've also lowered the thickness of reahut? Looks beautiful to me, better than stock without RRR![]()
This pic was missing in all JF7750 minute flaw discussions. One thing is to know it´s too fat, another is to see it like this. Thanks a lotJF A21J vs. JF 7750:
![]()
And the A21J all by itself:
Sent from my Note 5 using Tapatalk
And yes, slim hands are correct with RRR removed...
Not with that dial. Read the link here for a breakdown:
http://luxurytyme.com/en/rolex-related-articles/the-evolution-of-the-modern-era-rolex-daytona/
Slim hands would mean slim hour and minute hands as well with the engraving removed. It is also worth noting that the hour markers are smaller on the models with the slim hands. There was a fat hand model with small markers and no engraving.
Thx buddyI have a NOOB GMTII, will check once I get this new 116520.
@ shotgun, so now all you have to do is have the hands and dial re-lumed in green ,then you will be period correct Mk II 116520
according to the luxurytyme article