The longer I have this watch the more flaws I find.
Really this watch is faaaaar away from being a super-rep.
Not even close to the quality of Breitling, Panerai, IWC super reps.
Am I the only one with this flaw that I show you on the pictures below?
The bezel finish is utter garbage. Sorry to say that. This is something that I couldn‘t see on QC pictures as they don‘t take photos from this angle.
The edges of the polished part of the bezel don‘t match the edges of the brushed side-side of the bezel.
Look at the pictures:
I am really waiting for a good replica of the AP Diver as I love this watch so much. But all the flaws it has even with a closed case back is just disappointing. It is not a very difficult watch to replicate! Come on JF I know you can do better!
@bionone
@daher
I do agree with bosaftw that the watch isn’t a super rep but i disagree with the reasoning. I also disagree that it isn’t a difficult watch to rep. It is actually an intricate piece with lots of details which the rep makers have continued to get wrong with each iteration. Nine and a half versions later, the 15703st rep is still wrong in many ways.
It is however a nice watch for the price, if you ignore the inaccuracies vs gen. For $400 it is a nice watch to wear and the quality of the build is reasonable. It is not junk where watches go.
So not a super rep IMHO but a nice watch for sure. It’s what this hobby is about, wearing and enjoying replicas, flaws and all.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk