ZF is good in IWC, what you think about IW501005? Nice bronze watch, even movement is decorated to look like gen
Last edited:
If it can only be spotted on side-by-side comparison, it's indeed worthy of First Class. Unless there is an obvious flaw we can see at first glance, it will probably be accepted as such.
Could someone confirm the Omega Aqua Terra 8500 Clone - VSF as a first class rep? I know it is listed as first class but i want to be sure with it. So if there are any opinions from you guys i would be happy about it!
There should be plenty of opinions in the Omega sub-forum.
For me the best Rolex Rep is the Explorer or the Rolex Oyster Perpetual with A-ETA or SH movement
- no Date no trouble
- no bezel no trouble-
voila.
Beside of that the new Omega AT is my most fav of all the beloved ones.
For me the best Rolex Rep is the Explorer or the Rolex Oyster Perpetual with A-ETA or SH movement
- no Date no trouble
- no bezel no trouble-
voila.
Beside of that the new Omega AT is my most fav of all the beloved ones.
Is this generally accepted or more of an opinion?
Well there's some truth to it...
The bezel sure... on some watches like the LV (Hulk) the bezel is incredibly hard to get right. Similarly on almost all the ceramic inserts the lettering / numbers can fade. So no bezel.. no problem is true in that respect.
As for the movements... well actually this is where its an opinion. The 3xxx movements that the OP seems to have (cant find any 28xx on my TD's) these movements are quite unreliable...
A date isn't a hard complication so no fears there.
However dates also on Rolex clones are where it is quite noticeably different to the genuine. Magnification wrong... font wrong etc. So... therefore no date... no problem.
If you look at this list the Grey/Grape Oyster Perpetuals are listed as super clones. They're listed as JF... who are now know as AR factory.. (ARF). From what I have seen they look to be good watches. But the movements are poorly made and you should probably service them ASAP.
Servicing sounds like a pain. Would servicing a 3xxx movement even make it comparably reliable to a 28xx one?
Maybe the TDs will update the Oyster Perpetual with a new movement and then we would not have to worry about this issue.
Well there's some truth to it...
The bezel sure... on some watches like the LV (Hulk) the bezel is incredibly hard to get right. Similarly on almost all the ceramic inserts the lettering / numbers can fade. So no bezel.. no problem is true in that respect.
As for the movements... well actually this is where its an opinion. The 3xxx movements that the OP seems to have (cant find any 28xx on my TD's) these movements are quite unreliable...
A date isn't a hard complication so no fears there.
However dates also on Rolex clones are where it is quite noticeably different to the genuine. Magnification wrong... font wrong etc. So... therefore no date... no problem.
If you look at this list the Grey/Grape Oyster Perpetuals are listed as super clones. They're listed as JF... who are now know as AR factory.. (ARF). From what I have seen they look to be good watches. But the movements are poorly made and you should probably service them ASAP.
The BP version seems really solid with the 904, its a 28xx movement, but as far as I can tell this wouldnt prevent NWBIG status? I agree that the 28xx is the way too go. I havent found too much info about which explorer is best or what the big flaws are that keep it from being on this list.
If you look at this list the Grey/Grape Oyster Perpetuals are listed as super clones. They're listed as JF... who are now know as AR factory.. (ARF). From what I have seen they look to be good watches. But the movements are poorly made and you should probably service them ASAP.