- 18/7/18
- 646
- 167
- 43
sorry here's the link https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=652404
Yeye he’s also member of RWI and made the same post here
sorry here's the link https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=652404
oh yea i just saw the post....Yeye he’s also member of RWI and made the same post here
What a great review, thanks for posting the link. Looks like none of the gen white dial variations has that glossy shine of the CF subdials.I have seen on rolex forum that a member there have done a review on different year models of the black and white dial and even gen. watches has diferent color tone and shines.
wow , stunning bro, will order one too nowWhite dial looks updated.. better subdials and bezel. Just ordered this
Big improvement, looks more gen like now. Where did you order this? Thx
I agree on the watch itself, great case and bezel. But the subdials are still horribly wrong. Way too fat. A shame they can’t get the dial right.
I'm getting nothing but broken jpegs here. Just me or others getting this too?Hi guys,
Just received the Clean Factory 116520 steel bezel black dial real watch in hand.
Some pictures sharing as follows for you:
More pictures can go our website to have a look too.
---------------
Updates for this thread:
About the dial printing error at 33 position, have checked with factory.
Got answered as:
This is just a dial printing error on the sample they gave us, their official release stock wont have this issue.
All the best
Li from JTIME
The picture shows the set of watches that were studied, not the set of variations. There still may be 10 or so variations found, but based on small differences in font and printing. Regarding subdial sizes and colors there
same here. Broken images.I'm getting nothing but broken jpegs here. Just me or others getting this too?
Bought from which TD? Pictures are not visible...Hi guys,
Just received the Clean Factory 116520 steel bezel black dial real watch in hand.
Some pictures sharing as follows for you:
More pictures can go our website to have a look too.
---------------
Updates for this thread:
About the dial printing error at 33 position, have checked with factory.
Got answered as:
This is just a dial printing error on the sample they gave us, their official release stock wont have this issue.
All the best
Li from JTIME
Is it because the dials are aligned with the 10 and 2 perhaps? I see what you're seeing. Just asking though.dail looks off centered a lil bit tho, right?? the spacing between the 3 o'clock is less than 9 o'clok side. but dial itself looks stunning