Ive received my cf yesterday
The refference between lugs is still wrong
Enviado desde mi CLT-L09 mediante Tapatalk
That's the thing holding me up to get one its the wrong reference numbers between the lugs. So yours still says 126610 instead of 124060?
hi guys, do you know if is it possible to find it on EU stock?
Guys i just got the gen and i have the clean.
Following my impressions about the difference that i have noticed.
I have checked for the most the case but i'll compare also the bracelet when i'll have time.
I'm talking about flaws noticeable with naked eye at 20/30 cm distance.
- rehaut = Gen has a brighter surface than clean. It's the first flaw that i have noticed.
- hands = Gen has a warmer color than clean because they are made off white gold.
- crown guards = There is not too much difference but the gen one has a perfect shape.
- sels = Gen has perfect slightly recessed and tigh sels. Clean sels are good but they are not so perfect.
Operating differences:
- bezel click = Gen has a different sound and the rotation is more thwarted than Clean.
- crown = When you screw/unscrew, wind, set the time you feel the precision that you expect from a Rolex. My Clean has a really good crown action but you can't compare it to the Gen feeling.
That's all i have noticed after 5 minutes of play with my new baby.
I can say that you can wear your Clean thoughtless because it's near to impossible to spot as rep when you wrist it.
Only a gen owner who knows this rep world could notice those differences.
Relax and enjoy this beauty.
Here we go!
Gen shot:
Clean shot:
I would like also to add the timegrapher reads.
That's quite interesting....
Gen:
Clean:
Most of you guys think that gen means "watch from Mars, made of unobtanium from alien hands"
In fact the Clean one has a better amplitude and that's funny!
You are looking for details that also the Rolex AD doesn't know.
Be grateful thinking that you can get a 1:1 gen watch for 1-20 than reseller price.
That's in my opinion a little miracle!
Stop to looking for something that doesn't exist in real life.
Clean amplitude is higher because it's a 313X hybrid and not a 3230. Your gen 3230 runs is identical amplitude and beat error as my gen 3230. I can't get BE to 0.0 no matter how hard I try. Of course you should put lift angle at 55° for a true amplitude reading on the gen.
Thanks for the comparisons!
Thanks mate!
I didn't think that in fact here i have two different movements.
Anyway i didn't expect that beat error on the gen 3230 fresh from the AD.
I also have an 116610lv 2017 gen and it runs perfect with zero beat error from the first day that i got it new. I expected the same from this new movement.
Anyway it doesn't matter.
It is truly a beautiful piece. Thanks for the comparison photos, not everyone has a gen (and in this case the same model) to make comparisons.Here we go!
Most of you guys think that gen means "watch from Mars, made of unobtanium from alien hands"
In fact the Clean one has a better amplitude and that's funny!
You are looking for details that also the Rolex AD doesn't know.
Be grateful thinking that you can get a 1:1 gen watch for 1-20 than reseller price.
That's in my opinion a little miracle!
Stop to looking for something that doesn't exist in real life.
Fun fact, Rolex itself says in his technical informations the BE must be within 0.8 ms
Could be a faulty click or click spring too.When winding it, I feel and hear some strange grinding as if 2 pinions teeth jump each time I turn the crown.