That dial looks like pre 2015 Submariner to me, with short F in ft and spaced "m". Back then rep dials were pretty bad to my knowledge. They didn't have rounded hour markers. The dial looks gen to me.Vsf k25 with Frankenstein movement for only $8k. I gotta see how this one plays out
The seller has reposted that POS. This time with only a mention of the bezel with proof he bought something off chrono a couple of years ago. I gotta admit there’s a twisted part in me that’s kinda rooting for the guy like the story about “The Little Engine That Could”.I think my personal favorite about that particular listing was the broken insert. It looked like a trashed replica insert with a painted platinum mod that was coming off.
This one could be genuine…with a shitty cyclops/crystal and a mismatched bracelet. The seller seems to be a watch seller and has 1550 feedback with 100% positive. Of course, it is eBay so who knows. @tripdog ?How about this beauty....0 date magnification, shit endlink....sigh. I'm going to reach out and ask for a movement picture
Rolex Submariner Date 16610 40mm Black Stainless Steel A Serial | eBay
Rolex Submariner Date 16610. A serial, 1999 production. Watch only. 93150 bracelet.www.ebay.com
It’s like these guys buy 5 digit subs, wear them for a couple of years, and then put them on fleabay.How about this beauty....0 date magnification, shit endlink....sigh. I'm going to reach out and ask for a movement picture
Rolex Submariner Date 16610 40mm Black Stainless Steel A Serial | eBay
Rolex Submariner Date 16610. A serial, 1999 production. Watch only. 93150 bracelet.www.ebay.com
This one could be genuine…with a shitty cyclops/crystal and a mismatched bracelet. The seller seems to be a watch seller and has 1550 feedback with 100% positive. Of course, it is eBay so who knows. @tripdog ?
To me that speaks volumes...Well, he declined to show a movement picture.
Ehh, not everyone has the tools to open a Rolex. Other than the cyclops, the 16610 appears to be genuine.To me that speaks volumes...
The guy has over 1500 sales on eBay. It's not exactly rocket science to open up the case back. While I agree he's a high volume seller, so not an outright scammer, it's also possible that something may have slipped past or any number of other possibilities, including an absolute horrendous refurbishment job, which the more I look at the more I think this may be the case. Looking at this particular piece, the cap of the seconds hand looks like a replica and not nicely finished, the end link fitment is horrible, The Cyclops is not magnifying. There's a number of questions, and I would think that an honest seller would take a few minutes to quell concernsEhh, not everyone has the tools to open a Rolex. Other than the cyclops, the 16610 appears to be genuine.
It's a big ball of gaffa tape, anyone can make one.Ehh, not everyone has the tools to open a Rolex. Other than the cyclops, the 16610 appears to be genuine.
Sure, that may do the trick. I've seen it work. I've also seen it not work.It's a big ball of gaffa tape, anyone can make one.