Seems to me that the movement should be reliable.. heck , even better than gen ..after all 28800 is always better than 21600..lolMovement Details :
[/B][/COLOR]ETA uses a type of ball bearing automatic disc on the chain structure, the chain structure is currently used by the vast majority of the watch, the durability of this structure is very positive, but not on a chain efficiency, and Seiko magic Lever is a hook jaw cannot be compared. So - On Gen, more than 10 hours can be worn over the full winded, and REP i guess it takes more than 20 hours of normal wear to fully wind. Power Reserve on REP is 122 hrs and Gen is 168 hrs, difference of 46 Hours. Movement type engraved on GEN is 51011?but on REP is 61016. Gen beat rate is 21600 and REP beat rate is 28800 (Better!!!)
I think the YL number size is more accurate than ZF?
this is a great thread buy equally confusing. While both YL & ZF have their pros and cons, which one is better and closer to gen overall?
Or should i ask - which one do you prefer overall?
As far as I could comprehend it, the majority are on the ZF as an overall better one.
I think too many people are banking on the ZF "name". I think there are aspects to the new factory which make that watch way better. Principally, the font thickness and the shape of the hands. The case used to be wrong but now its been fixed to which seems to be identical to ZF.
As far as I could comprehend it, the majority are on the ZF as an overall better one.
I think one of the most important thing is the dial color. Which one is closer to gen. Based on the pictures posted, ZF has a creamy look while the YL has a solid white color, zf is closer to gen, correct?
Sent from my SM-N9100 using Tapatalk