- 1/8/17
- 1,890
- 702
- 113
The ARF 126600 keeps amazing me ! Since I received it, my genuine sea-dweller 16600 doesn't get worn at all...
I’ve had the 126600 for a little while, and just got it back from Vac. Got a spa service and a Prof Crystal installed. I didn’t think this thing could look any better...now was I wrong! Looks so much better without that cyclops.
Now I’m going to want these crystals on all my watches.
Thanks
vaccum prof
Looks amazing. We need more picsI’ve had the 126600 for a little while, and just got it back from Vac. Got a spa service and a Prof Crystal installed. I didn’t think this thing could look any better...now was I wrong! Looks so much better without that cyclops.
Now I’m going to want these crystals on all my watches.
Thanks
vaccum prof
I’ve had the 126600 for a little while, and just got it back from Vac. Got a spa service and a Prof Crystal installed. I didn’t think this thing could look any better...now was I wrong! Looks so much better without that cyclops.
Now I’m going to want these crystals on all my watches.
Thanks
vaccum prof
Thanks fellas. It is much better without that silly cyclops. One of the main reasons I’m not a fan of most Rolex’s. More pics for you all below!
Thanks fellas. It is much better without that silly cyclops. One of the main reasons I’m not a fan of most Rolex’s. More pics for you all below!
hello you have a very nice watch.
I also buy the same model as you SD50 ARF.
can you please give me a links to buy, the same glass as you
I find it much more beautiful with your glass
Thank you for your help.
hello you have a very nice watch.
I also buy the same model as you SD50 ARF.
can you please give me a links to buy, the same glass as you
I find it much more beautiful with your glass
Thank you for your help.
There is no doubt at all that your watch looks stunning Better than it did before and ironically, I fear, due to the AR better than a gen, which in itself is a big tell. If like me you don't care if anyone thinks it is rep or gen, then just enjoy your wonderful looking watch.
Great photos too.
Nice mate! But the dial sucks no round markers and markers to close at 12 instant tell on pictures but not on wrist.
Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
Dont want to roll this up but i needed to respond i had the watch. The biggest tell is the "sharp bezel teeth" compare it to gen its just too sharp thats more important than the hour marker's because you cant see them onwrist. the bezel teeth is something that you can see.
Mate yours is v1 or v2? Maybe u can post some picture. I understand v2 upgraded the dw and sharpness of the bezel teeth.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mate yours is v1 or v2? Maybe u can post some picture. I understand v2 upgraded the dw and sharpness of the bezel teeth.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There are variants of the bezel. I got lucky with this one. Received QC on another that look decent. Not as good as this one but better than another I have. Guess just luck of the draw.