IMO yes. They are not as white as ARF ones.Is the VRF hands better than ARF ones?
IMO yes. They are not as white as ARF ones.Is the VRF hands better than ARF ones?
Very nice !
The girl is thinking why is he looking at his watch all the time lol
They look young. She has plenty of time to learn the life of an RWI widow.
I'm honestly sick and tired of all you showing off your watches.
I've just placed an order...
I see what you mean about the noticeably smaller date window. In addition to the gasket, it could be your gen crystal was 1.8mm and maybe the rep was 2.0mm
The CAR-V3-C1 is a YM crystal but that's not the whole issue. There was a brief period I think in 2015 when Rolex decided that 2.0x would be better than 2.5x on the cyclops magnification. There was such backlash that Rolex ended up replacing them free if new owners wanted them changed. Yours could be one of those.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=429756
FYI if anyone was wondering; ordered a separate ARF 116710 bracelet and it fits gen 116710
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nice one bro, you just wanted to save wear and tear on your gen bracelet?
My gen bracelet has plenty of wear already, so a bit late for that lol
I actually got it for my gen BLRO. Contemplating selling the BLNR, and wanted to keep the “look” of an oyster GMT in the lineup.
Figured I could just keep the BLRO and have both the jubilee and oyster as options for it.
The ARF bracelet is really good, brushing, tightness, click of clasp, etc. But it is still a tad too sharp on the edges compared to gen. The gen bracelet feels a bit rounded off and smoother. Close tho, like 9/10 close.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk