- 26/6/13
- 2,249
- 116
- 63
Yes. That was one of the updates to the v3 no more of the 3x mag and fat dw combo! Unfortunately my ARF LN suffers from that flaw so its a bad comparison but part of the problem is on camera and on screen this dw looks normal ( like in this pic) and in person something looks lower then it should and I can tell if its the dw or mag...
Actually, I don’t think it is lower than 2.5x. It actually look awesome to me. I remember seeing complaints about Arf cyclop being too big like 3x. Yours looks 2.5x and perfect IMO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk