- 12/10/19
- 330
- 183
- 43
Can you explain to me why and where ARF gmt case is wrong?
i built my franken on the ARF case with VR movement and all gen parts, do you think i should use another case? and if so, which one?
Thank you very much
I saw your franken and it’s beautiful.
However if you ask me, ARF case is totally wrong. GMT lugs should be slimmer than sub ones to start. ARF lugs are as big as the ones of a correct sub case. They are too fat for a GMT.
Second, they are too soft and lack gen sharpness.
Third, curvature on ARF lugs/case is not correct at all. They miss the right lugs/side curvature that gen has. This contribute to make the watch looks fat.
Lastly, CGs are slimmer and of a different shape/lenght of the ones of the gen and this is absolutely evident to the eye if you know the gen. For lugs you need to look carefully, for CGs no. They are obvious.
When I look at ARF cases I just think they are trolling us making all their watches fatter than gen.
Noob cases are better. Also VRF ones are.
To validate what I am saying just look at plenty of gen/ARF photos and videos and it will become evident also to you. Even Better, if you can, is to check in real life with the gen side by side.
Last edited: