- 3/12/18
- 141
- 33
- 0
It looks a bit better overall in these pics. I guess we'll just have to wait until someone has it in hand
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Ohh lol, sorry. Thought u were talking about the one that was released months ago. Well there are puretime pics.lol its the one we are talking about since 10 sites made they even use the same pictures like on the site just different lightning.
Don't think they can fix that
I can't understand why? I mean the printing on my Quartz Version is not 100 % aswell but only costs around 139 dollars, this JF version will likely costs around 350-400 dollars and they even put worse printing on it which really does not look. I mean how difficult it can be to print white minute markers + swiss made on a simple dial like that. I mean the watch would look perfect. Ok the height is wrong but i would buy it BUT with such shitty printing its not worth the money in my opinion.
JF please fix the printing i hope its a prototype on the pictures.
I saw news of TWF repping a thinner version than JF. Seems it is using a similar way how the KMF repping 5177...Do anyone have some insight about this?
https://m.imgur.com/a/mIP1Z9o
Dw placement is wrong, minute and hour hand is longer etc.I saw news of TWF repping a thinner version than JF. Seems it is using a similar way how the KMF repping 5167...Do anyone have some insight about this?
https://m.imgur.com/a/mIP1Z9o
I saw news of TWF repping a thinner version than JF. Seems it is using a similar way how the KMF repping 5167...Do anyone have some insight about this?
https://m.imgur.com/a/mIP1Z9o