I am comparing my V6F 438 against this... am I the only one who see a bit strange the CG of that VSF??? I mean, it looks like the pusher it is not fitted correctly in the CG and finishing (in photos) looks a bit better in my KW and even the engravings ... what do you think?
Pusher? I don't understand what you mean. Probably better by posting pictures of your V6F PAM438 against the images of the VSF PAM441.
Pusher? I don't understand what you mean. Probably better by posting pictures of your V6F PAM438 against the images of the VSF PAM441.
Exactly, I was thinking in a crown pusher and wrote that lol. But I was talking about the lever of the cgThink he meant the CG lever
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My fault, I didn't explain it well. I will try to post pics but I said the pusher instead of the lever. In the pictures showing side by side gen vs VSF I saw a bit strange how fits in the CG the lever in VSF (even I see a gap between lever and the CG when lever is closed/pushed in those pictures). Looking to my KW 438, for example, and the pictures of the beginning I see that my lever and the gen's lever fits perfect in the CG. Maybe is only because of the quality of the pictures...
Is this worth the risk of a new from scratch Asian movement?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've got this sitting in a cart ready to pull the trigger. Has anyone seen on in the flesh yet?
Imho Big give out on this rep... on the window date you can see a white line between the dial and the movement due to its sandwich dial... the 328/441 has it... can anyone else see it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk