Hi friends
Please let me some days or at least some hours to make some comparisons
At this moment I can see:
-As I expected there are no modifications on movement. It seems a decoration based in PT previous decoration bridges with the screws already chromed. The only change is that CAL. P.3000 bridge has two jewels instead of three like PT version
- Better engraving LP on dial. Fonts are almost perfect, thick like gen, I cannot see the depth but seems better than previous versions. Just the transition edges of the fonts are not so crisp as gen ones (see below pics angles marked with orange arrow for example). LP inscription is better in general than previous versions.
- Lume colour of markers and inscription OK
- Better crystal shape
- Movement the same accuracy of PT previous version, worse fitting of decoration bridges than H maker.
- Case and caseback seem good
- Better hands (with a bit rounded edges) but better width and lume width
- It seems that engravings between lugs are very depth, even more than gen, but more accurate than previous versions
- Strap seems improved
Provisional conclusion:
Overall better version mainly regarding LP inscription accuracy and colour (it is really important on this watch), better engravings between lugs and crystal shape.
Movement is in practice the same as Puretime version and with a bit worse fitting between decoration bridges than H maker.
Provisional classification from better to worse:
- Noob
- Puretime (with corrected chromed CP and movement screws)
- H maker
H maker has just a bit better fitting movement decoration bridges, nothing more
Waiting for more info
ALE