• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

Swiss watch industry Crisis ? Rep super clone movements ?

Flyingman

Getting To Know The Place
9/11/17
36
40
18
Well writen, I share the same views on almost all the topics you mentioned, apart from the last one about potential available of certain rep movement.
The thing is this :
The true clone Rolex movements on the market today are exactly what they say : " true clones " meaning the parts are interchangeable with gen movements , and of course generic Rolex parts ( part made for Rolex movements made by legal third party companies ) The generic parts are widely and reasonably priced available from all watch part suppliers and have been for years because of Rolex and other Swiss watch companies monopolizing the watch part market , The Swatch group , ETA movement manufacturers monopoly is a prime example, they have ( Swatch group , owners of omega and other big brands ) a pending court case against them by a major watch part supplier in Europe, for monopolizing and not supplying independent watchmakers and suppliers with parts .
So my point is that even if a rep factory stops producing a super clone Rolex movement, there is absolutely no problem in servicing it with new generic parts that like I said are widely available worldwide.
 

Flyingman

Getting To Know The Place
9/11/17
36
40
18
True rep or gen should only be purchased for yourself no other reason same as anything is still wear my gens or my reps regardless of what I’m wearing, I just meant that the younglings who can’t afford their next months Spotify do like to blow money on a flashy rep not for the watch but for the image it portrays they would also be likely to buy the same gen if they had the cash rather than put it to better use, like you say poor money management. All that said though peops can do as they please if it makes them happy. Ralph Lauren is another brand where reps probably sell as many as genuine and the genuine stuff is not all that much, I’ve always purchased RL stuff cos it fits me of the shelf well and does tend to last, I’ve tried a Kuala Lumpur night market special for a giggle and after a few wears and washes it’s lost its colour, but not was only £3, clothes are not a watch for sure.

Reps now are so much better than the old market ones where is was obvious these days though for a good quality watch whether it has a faux dial and markings or not a rep has been pretty well built and probably not too different to a Tag these days! The cost to make a Rolex vs the profit they make would be interesting to know cost as in materials, but I’m sure they would argue all the r and d etc…. Is where their margin is basses

When I say well trained eye though Im not talking just a dealer, there are plenty of people on this site that I would consider well trained and when people post QC pics for advice on even the top models say the likes of Noob in their day and now Clean Factory (im guessing re-invented Noob) we can spot the subly differences but only under close scrutiny. An RSC or someone who works on them who keeps their hand in these forums would be able to tell but they wont be all that many.

I agree on the wrist though is very hard to tell but there are some give aways such as say for a GMT pepsi not turning all red under UV light on the earlier reps, this would be an easy tell in a nightclub but not on the street. Most would never know that anyway.

I think like you say Frankens are hard to tell unless being opened and even then they would need to be torn down, if most of the exposed parts have been swapped to gen or gen spec the finish would be the same.

In reality we are all maybe a little bit too close to the topic of real vs rep (I say rep, as fake doesnt really cover it these days as even some of the low end reps are still pretty reasonable watches in their own right).
We look for the flaws far more than anyone else would.

Ive worn gens out and have still had some cocky prick ask "is it real?" I normally just say no I got it free in a kinder egg and then move on as they dont really know how to deal with it yet spend the rest of the evening checking it out!

There is one big and easy tell though and that is there will be know paperwork or traceability on a rep unless its been meticulously built using a serial number from a genuine watch and then the movement parts upgraded with gen or gen spec it would then be very hard to say its not genuine.

This would be much easier on older models such as a sub or gmt 5 digit or even easier on the DJ's, but the movement itself would have to be period correct for the model no good having a newer style movement in an older case as it would then be questioned.

I think for the outside definitely but once opened even if it were to have say bridge and rotor and other parts were replaced for gen or gen spec (gen spec is most likely going to be the case for anyhting our of the RSC world) I doubt a service house would actually bother checking if they had no reason to believe its not a genuine model. I suspect that anything that does have gen spec parts on it might be even more beliveable on and older model for sure.

The newer GMT's and Daytonas in stainless are ever so close if the bridge was changed I reckon like you say it would be very hard to tell but there will be a serial to order parts based on and that would be the kicker.

I think the the following items are the thing people focus on to check originality with their eyes

Dial - (printing is key and the crown shape if not a precious metal one) some of the reps are great until you go macro on them, but still could be a refinshed dial perhaps)

Crystal - Alignment but also clarity does it really have that sparkle that the gen has (also maybe the height although I had a sub serviced and the glass looked too low and when I questioned it they agreed and swapped it no RSC or AD but a Rolex dealer)
Does the crystal had AR in the right places, LEC on non lec models or vice versa.

Case, these are often the easiet to get right but for some reason the older 5 digits seem to have issues witht the crown guards and tube stem height (this is were they really are not replicating they are copying someone homework that copied it from someone else)
Most cases these days are really pretty good although some of the etching can be not so good and maybe the gap toloerances on lugs, this is most likely just excess polishing and is still pretty good on most.
Bracelet - Stainless models are harder and its really down to brushing, and often the clasp on the flip locks some are a little too close in comparison but as they are tight only someone who has seen many would maybe question this.
The etching on the clasp the old STEEL INOX vs STEELINOX is silly but again only a person who knows what they are looking would notice (I doubt the Ebay Authentication team would spot alot of these!)
The wrong clasp type for the bracelet can raise questions but this is rare on the new breeds
No point in trying with the TT or FullGolds or Platinums as its far to obvious but only when in the hand! The looks are really good on a lot of them but the weight is far from it.
TT's are never that good due to the sides of the gold sections, they are wrapped or plated yes and the gold is very good but the workmanship is not as the wrap or plate is applied after the bracelet is built, so there are often lazy lines or missed bits. Maybe this would go undetected to most but if a person that likes watches too a look at it they might wonder why its not solid gold centre links?

Movement This is the last thing most will inspect, as long as its not ticking every second and has a sweep motion I doubt it would be questioned ever, even if you handed to them and they undid the crown and changed the time or felt the winding resistance. They would not know that winding the movement in reverse changes the hour hand forward on the modern GMT's but got back a few years to 116710's and its forward as they are different movements only use nerds know this and probably alot of service guys wont pay much attention to it.
The ease of winding might be a cheap movement fell or it could be interpretted as and posh watch luxury feel (less effort and all that) So I doubt it would be a giveaway unless handling them all the time (an if parts have been swapp for gen to enhance this no one would know).

Most people even non watch people know that a genuine Rolex never ticks (most dont know the Oyster Quartz even exists) so as long as it sweeps it wont be that well scrutinized unless the aim is to call the person out.

It would be interesting to do a side by side with a gen of the same age and year as a rep that has had full franken treatment as far as looks go. Most of the one we see on YT are videos more for likes and subs than a real bench mark as some of the one ive seen the rep is good but not as good as some the one around or indeed the franken models some of the legends build on here.

I think the time it will be a real crisis is when the market gets flooded with frankens and dealers start getting caught out.

Im sure there are alot of peops out there with frankens or really good reps that have paid through the nose for them thinking as they had a box and papers it must be real! Ive seen a few in Vegas pawn shops that are up for sale in amongst gen one and its clear they are questionable but only as the are side by side and I doubt the shop is any the wiser they bought it cheap and sell it cheap, if it works and neve has an issue like some of the reps these days it might never be a problem until it gets sold on years later.

In KL I went into soem stores that looked like an official Rolex dealer all smartly dressed etc.... and they experience was very similar to that of an AD as far as white gloves etc... only difference was that price of the items!

I guuess if I bought a gen and it turned out to be a rep the only thing that would bother me is the money, If id been wearing it for a few years with no issue and then decided to sell it or it needed fixing and was then told its a rep. I would of been none the wiser right up until that point and still had the same enjoyment out it. There have been cases where the uneducated have called a gen a rep or fake when its not its just had the incorrect parts fitted to it over the years such as bracelet or dial or crystal.
Interesting though non the less Rolex are themselves to blame to be fair as the rep community now is stornger than ever due to the massive price hikes over the years and the shortness of supply of the sports and lower end models. The created this due to supply and demand. Rolexes have always een available to buy right up until the launch of the Ceramic models and larger case size model the main ones up until then that were the unicorns were the White Face Daytona, Explorer, and a few others due to short supply.
These days nearly all entry model or sports models are non existient and the sold ones are in safes or dealer windows and only ever offered to special customers! So they chose that route.
But there is still the fact that someone who is happy to spend $600 is unlikely to be talked into spending $10k or more and someone looking to spend $10+ on a watch is not often going to be looking to invest time in looking into reps as the market is shall we say hard work and never guaranteed, no warranty and is still illegal trade, the number of people who get ripped off or pay more for a low grade model where they simply dont know enough is all too often. There are alot of vaporware sites selling AAA Grade Swiss made models that will never appear, load on Facebook and there is no comeback from you credit card as its illegal anyway. This site is a great place for all us like minded peops but at the same time there is the flat earthers! We are a small section of the world and we actively enjoy learning about it all and appreciate what goes into it all btu others not so much they just wanna buy a watch either for themselves or to impress their mates or keep up with the social crowd.

The rep world offers a lot for sure but its still a big risk to many, the other donwside that the gen market doenst suffer from is parts.
Think back to say 2010 reps were still being made and some pretty good but if it were to fail chances are getting parts for the movement would be hardwork, if its a modded one, and then if trying to change it for a newer movement witl it fit the dial, hands or case etc... the models out now will are much better but how long will a vr 3186 be available into the future as the newer models all take DD3285 say (not being specific here) if the facotories making the reps keep churning out the newer models and the demand for them is harder they will simply stop making the older movements and parts, granted the models that do have interchangeability with gne parts this shouldnt be and issue, but at the same time why do they not choose to replicat the correct bridges on the rep movements in the first place.

All good though, I wonder how many on this site have ever been caught out with a rep masquerading as a gen as I reckon you are right even with the older not so good models that are not the super reps have gone under the radar many times
Again well writen, Regarding the 5 digit sub gmt , there is a Vietnamese company producing a one to one true case clone of 5 digit sub/gmt at a 1200 usd price point.

You can't tell the case apart from a gen one ..... just saying 😉😁


Can you imagine how many rfranken reps are selling on Chrono 24 from unsuspected and suspect sellers /dealers ?
 

TerryRobot

Renowned Member
Patron
Certified
13/9/15
597
461
63
Well writen, I share the same views on almost all the topics you mentioned, apart from the last one about potential available of certain rep movement.
The thing is this :
The true clone Rolex movements on the market today are exactly what they say : " true clones " meaning the parts are interchangeable with gen movements , and of course generic Rolex parts ( part made for Rolex movements made by legal third party companies ) The generic parts are widely and reasonably priced available from all watch part suppliers and have been for years because of Rolex and other Swiss watch companies monopolizing the watch part market , The Swatch group , ETA movement manufacturers monopoly is a prime example, they have ( Swatch group , owners of omega and other big brands ) a pending court case against them by a major watch part supplier in Europe, for monopolizing and not supplying independent watchmakers and suppliers with parts .
So my point is that even if a rep factory stops producing a super clone Rolex movement, there is absolutely no problem in servicing it with new generic parts that like I said are widely available worldwide.
Yeah i get they are clones but i was under the impression and that could be completely incorrect by the way that not all gen parts will fit the cloned version or at least without a bit of tinkering. I'm no watchsmith so cant ad much more than ive read same as the reason why the reps dont use a clone of the correct balance bridges I guess, there must be a reason, they did hide the balance weight on the 3285 so at first glance it look normal but the effort for that im not sure why they didnt just copy the gen items in the first place I suspect its down to the movement being different enough to not be under copyright as the non trade marked version will be in legit homages, the only difference is the reps get the engraving version. If they really do swap all parts then yes they have a life as long as the gen although there will come a time where it will become a gen movement if enough parts are replaced and then its no longer a rep anyway, bit like Triggers boom, he's had the same broom for 20years and its only had 17 new handles and 14 new brushes

It would be a great video for someone to tear down 2 movements one gen one rep and then rebuild then a 5050 swap of parts and see how they stack up
 

Zeta7

I'm Pretty Popular
Certified
9/11/23
1,148
1,171
113
I see Gen Rolex’s selling as slightly used for a little less than new and I wonder how many people are buying Frankensteins and don’t know it. A bracelet and bezel swap could go unnoticed by the majority of the people buying. The watch store can easily sell those parts and pocket an extra $6k on a $10k Rolex 124060.
 

Flyingman

Getting To Know The Place
9/11/17
36
40
18
Yeah i get they are clones but i was under the impression and that could be completely incorrect by the way that not all gen parts will fit the cloned version or at least without a bit of tinkering. I'm no watchsmith so cant ad much more than ive read same as the reason why the reps dont use a clone of the correct balance bridges I guess, there must be a reason, they did hide the balance weight on the 3285 so at first glance it look normal but the effort for that im not sure why they didnt just copy the gen items in the first place I suspect its down to the movement being different enough to not be under copyright as the non trade marked version will be in legit homages, the only difference is the reps get the engraving version. If they really do swap all parts then yes they have a life as long as the gen although there will come a time where it will become a gen movement if enough parts are replaced and then its no longer a rep anyway, bit like Triggers boom, he's had the same broom for 20years and its only had 17 new handles and 14 new brushes

It would be a great video for someone to tear down 2 movements one gen one rep and then rebuild then a 5050 swap of parts and see how they stack
I think its just a matter of time before we,see a true clone balance complete. I dont think it's a trademark issue.. the legality issue aspect in the factory Rep world went out the window when they made the first quartz rep of a Rolex back in the day 😅😅
 
  • Like
Reactions: TerryRobot

1TrueDeveloper

Known Member
DO NOT TRADE WITH ME
INMATE
MULTI ACCOUNT
Certified
9/7/23
125
61
28
Germany
The Wine market has become like the art market. It's not made by the artists, it's made by the critics. And the critics are highly corruptible people most of the times.
Mind elaborating on the critics part?
 

Zeta7

I'm Pretty Popular
Certified
9/11/23
1,148
1,171
113
Yeah i get they are clones but i was under the impression and that could be completely incorrect by the way that not all gen parts will fit the cloned version or at least without a bit of tinkering. I'm no watchsmith so cant ad much more than ive read same as the reason why the reps dont use a clone of the correct balance bridges I guess, there must be a reason, they did hide the balance weight on the 3285 so at first glance it look normal but the effort for that im not sure why they didnt just copy the gen items in the first place I suspect its down to the movement being different enough to not be under copyright as the non trade marked version will be in legit homages, the only difference is the reps get the engraving version. If they really do swap all parts then yes they have a life as long as the gen although there will come a time where it will become a gen movement if enough parts are replaced and then its no longer a rep anyway, bit like Triggers boom, he's had the same broom for 20years and its only had 17 new handles and 14 new brushes

It would be a great video for someone to tear down 2 movements one gen one rep and then rebuild then a 5050 swap of parts and see how they stack up
Gen parts work great. I had my Starbucks and no date returned to Rolex’s original design. They perform super and I think it’d be difficult to tell them from gen.

 

Flyingman

Getting To Know The Place
9/11/17
36
40
18
Thanks a lot for proving my point @Zeta7 .
Too all these so called " experts " gray market watch sellers on Tik Tok.....that can sniff out a rolex rep by just " winding it and using a loupe that shows and just proves how little to no watchmaking knowledge they have ...other than that keep on making " Mazal " deals with watch dealers that are " experts " on reference watch numbers ... but have a very limited to no horological watchmaking knowledge...
 

TerryRobot

Renowned Member
Patron
Certified
13/9/15
597
461
63
I think its just a matter of time before we,see a true clone balance complete. I dont think it's a trademark issue.. the legality issue aspect in the factory Rep world went out the window when they made the first quartz rep of a Rolex back in the day 😅😅
I wasnt thinking about the rep clones but the actual movements themselves are generic clone movements its just the rep version has the extra engraving. The movements with out any of the trademark engravings are used in the likes of the Pagani stuff that appears on amazon and its that reason I reckon they choose not to perfect a total carbon copy balance soe they can wriggle out of copyright. Yuo are right the rep market they clearly dont care but the factories often dont just make reps they make a lot of the $100 homages which are in reality reps that dont have the Rolex printed dial, braclet clasp or decorated movement or engraved rehaut. I think these are the ones where they have to be careful but they could rep the balance as well and then only fit to the models they engrave which would then make for an almost near perfect rep mechaincally apart form the quality of the material used for the parts, as in some having softer metals or the finish on moving parts not quite ot the same tolerances.
 

TerryRobot

Renowned Member
Patron
Certified
13/9/15
597
461
63
Gen parts work great. I had my Starbucks and no date returned to Rolex’s original design. They perform super and I think it’d be difficult to tell them from gen.

Cool if it works I was led to belive that sometimes fitting the gen spring cna over stress some of the other components over time where perhaps the gears are not quite as well cut or thickness. Might never be an issue and might only be on the GMT movements due to their extra complication. From and engineering perspective I can see it swinging both ways, the parts can/will fit but might require some of the other addtional moving parts swapped out at the same time probably more the moving machined parts where the gen or gen spec stuff has better tolerances on the finish. Im sure the reps are very close but looking at some of the post on this site comparing internals there can be quite a difference. The reps are very good but I would guess when their tooling is on its downward cycle they will get as much sue as they can where as Rolex would stop and use new tooling to avoid any sub stanard parts going out, also Rolex and Gen spec stuff will have better QC than alot of the China factories, they will take more a Land Rover approach of "that'll do" sometimes as its based on price. A few gen parts can cost the same price as a whole new VR3186.

Modding one with gen parts is a good way though to increase accuracy and longevity along wiht a full service, the main body parts and jewels are not really going to cause any real grief.

Out of interest what kinda money was that? Where did you get it done feel free to DM me if its UK and you dont wanna broadcast it though
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flyingman

Flyingman

Getting To Know The Place
9/11/17
36
40
18
I wasnt thinking about the rep clones but the actual movements themselves are generic clone movements its just the rep version has the extra engraving. The movements with out any of the trademark engravings are used in the likes of the Pagani stuff that appears on amazon and its that reason I reckon they choose not to perfect a total carbon copy balance soe they can wriggle out of copyright. Yuo are right the rep market they clearly dont care but the factories often dont just make reps they make a lot of the $100 homages which are in reality reps that dont have the Rolex printed dial, braclet clasp or decorated movement or engraved rehaut. I think these are the ones where they have to be careful but they could rep the balance as well and then only fit to the models they engrave which would then make for an almost near perfect rep mechaincally apart form the quality of the material used for the parts, as in some having softer metals or the finish on moving parts not quite ot the same tolerances.
The balance balance regulation screws are not a new invention, it's well over 100 years old , so no patent issues there . I believe it's rep factories just take time to get things exactly right, we've come a long way since the first quartz rep rolex , but it took some years to get to today's true super clones, and that's why I posted this thread in the first place , and why I believe the Swiss watch industry is heading for a crisis again .
Because the rep quality is actually really good. Dare to say on par with gen .. if one does what we have mentioned previously on this thread .....
 

Flyingman

Getting To Know The Place
9/11/17
36
40
18
Cool if it works I was led to belive that sometimes fitting the gen spring cna over stress some of the other components over time where perhaps the gears are not quite as well cut or thickness. Might never be an issue and might only be on the GMT movements due to their extra complication. From and engineering perspective I can see it swinging both ways, the parts can/will fit but might require some of the other addtional moving parts swapped out at the same time probably more the moving machined parts where the gen or gen spec stuff has better tolerances on the finish. Im sure the reps are very close but looking at some of the post on this site comparing internals there can be quite a difference. The reps are very good but I would guess when their tooling is on its downward cycle they will get as much sue as they can where as Rolex would stop and use new tooling to avoid any sub stanard parts going out, also Rolex and Gen spec stuff will have better QC than alot of the China factories, they will take more a Land Rover approach of "that'll do" sometimes as its based on price. A few gen parts can cost the same price as a whole new VR3186.

Modding one with gen parts is a good way though to increase accuracy and longevity along wiht a full service, the main body parts and jewels are not really going to cause any real grief.

Out of interest what kinda money was that? Where did you get it done feel free to DM me if its UK and you dont wanna broadcast it though
We are talking about 4 wheels on the train ... if they don't sit correctly they won't turn and the pivots will brake off when forced or the balance balance is not the correct "size " for the train of wheels then you will get crazy numbers on the timegrapher.... so none of the above happening has you can see on the read out paper of @Zeta7 ...it's not rocket science..😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: TerryRobot

Feefo

CEO, Vaselume (TM) Corporation
Staff member
Moderator Sales
Certified
8/5/22
20,067
52,785
113
EU
Mind elaborating on the critics part?
Modern critics wield the power of shaping the public opinion around an artist or a product. The act of criticism is judging something according to principles of beauty, goodness and truth and explore its boundaries. Hence, it's something that highly reflects personal preferences and biases. Who is to say this aspect also properly reflects the role of art/a product with respect to its proper historical and social significance? Any good orator will be able to argue whatever he wants and influence the public opinion. While until the 20th century the role of criticism was more or less occupied by scholars who knew their stuff (who were nonetheless biased in their own way), nowadays "influencing" has become a profession. Subjective evaluations aimed at market manipulation is the rule today. Getting back to the wine analogy, there's wine critics claiming they taste between 10.000 and 14.000 new wines each year. That's a lot of wine tasting per day. How can such an evaluation be objective, let alone for the organolectic capabilities of one's taste papillae which won't be equal during a year. The same way pharmaceutical companies offer "trainings" in 7-star resorts in tropical paradises wine producers offer stuff under the desk to wine critics.
With art, it's a bit different, art galleries come into play but also these will follow their interests which are to meet the tastes of those who can afford expensive art and not the tastes of the wider population or the significance of an artist and his work in relation to history, society, the evolution of art etc.
Sure, genuine art meeting these requirements still sees the light of the day, but monetary interests of a limited amount of people play a bigger role.
Well, it's quite the complex topic and it can be contradictory in itself, and I'm not able to express it as I would like to. Plus, I have top get back to work...
 

Flyingman

Getting To Know The Place
9/11/17
36
40
18
Modern critics wield the power of shaping the public opinion around an artist or a product. The act of criticism is judging something according to principles of beauty, goodness and truth and explore its boundaries. Hence, it's something that highly reflects personal preferences and biases. Who is to say this aspect also properly reflects the role of art/a product with respect to its proper historical and social significance? Any good orator will be able to argue whatever he wants and influence the public opinion. While until the 20th century the role of criticism was more or less occupied by scholars who knew their stuff (who were nonetheless biased in their own way), nowadays "influencing" has become a profession. Subjective evaluations aimed at market manipulation is the rule today. Getting back to the wine analogy, there's wine critics claiming they taste between 10.000 and 14.000 new wines each year. That's a lot of wine tasting per day. How can such an evaluation be objective, let alone for the organolectic capabilities of one's taste papillae which won't be equal during a year. The same way pharmaceutical companies offer "trainings" in 7-star resorts in tropical paradises wine producers offer stuff under the desk to wine critics.
With art, it's a bit different, art galleries come into play but also these will follow their interests which are to meet the tastes of those who can afford expensive art and not the tastes of the wider population or the significance of an artist and his work in relation to history, society, the evolution of art etc.
Sure, genuine art meeting these requirements still sees the light of the day, but monetary interests of a limited amount of people play a bigger role.
Well, it's quite the complex topic and it can be contradictory in itself, and I'm not able to express it as I would like to. Plus, I have top get back to work...
I totally agree , as to the watch industry parallel? Well let's put it this way ... and I will just mention the Swiss watch tool industry (watchmaker tools )
If you one has seen early videos/photos of watchmaking Influencers the vast majority of them use Chinese replica tools , of the 2 big Swiss watch tool companies... forward a few thousand followers and suddenly the are just using ,promoting and selling swiss kits at outrageous prices on there sites and chanels the Swiss big brand watchmaking tools claiming them ( the swiss tools ) superior and extraordinary ... meanwhile the Chinese rep tools that they all had are no where to be seen on pictures or videos..... so ya ... subjective... 😂😂
 

TerryRobot

Renowned Member
Patron
Certified
13/9/15
597
461
63
We are talking about 4 wheels on the train ... if they don't sit correctly they won't turn and the pivots will brake off when forced or the balance balance is not the correct "size " for the train of wheels then you will get crazy numbers on the timegrapher.... so none of the above happening has you can see on the read out paper of @Zeta7 ...it's not rocket science..😉
No not saying it is but the spring itself for a gen will be of better quality parts and hold more tension Im sure the parts will fit fine and can be tuned as such I wasnt quesitoning that but by added a more powerful component into a movement that has lesser QC on the components such as the grades of materials used or the overall finish it could create more load on said items.

I would like to see under a macro scope the componets side by side for fit and finish on the gears more than anything else the gen will be ot a standard and the rep will still be very close but not always the same quality finish so as some point will wear quicker than a gen spec or gen part. Im saying they are both very good but Snap-on sell tools and so does Amazon but the quality is worlds apart, both do the same job but one will do it for much longer due to the quality of the ingredients so to speak. There will always be brand markup and hype on both but I bet if you got materials expert to anaylse both set of components with out seeing the branding the gen item will com out on top due the to machining, as the chinese are making a copy but to a price where as roelx is not. As they will easily get their money back.

From a fit for purpose and accuracy side of things there is no real difference and it could well be that the quality and finish of the gen stuff isnt actually needed in order to guarantee its life span. Rolex would argue that their models are still going 50 years on with little in terms of replacement parts.

I think yes swapping parts on them as they fail is a good plan like you would on a gen, its debateable that if you replaced the tell tale items from a visual perspective and then sent it to a service centre whether they would notice, if nothing was broken aside from just taking apart and cleaning and then putting back I suspect it would go un checked, how close the jewels are and the sizes might be different I guess but only a well versed service tech would notice any differences if there were any.

I had a much older Sub 11610 gen and that time it kept even after a service was not as good as my gen Navitimer or Chronomat and I had a rep sub that kept marginally better time. So that can only really be component wear as the gen was much oder in terms of material wear than the rep as its was technically almost new but imitating the 11610.

As good as rep are they will still ways use cheaper grade components to keep the costs down, i doubt in the very basic terms the individual componets cost to make a rolex movement could be done so for less thna the price of a whole rep though.

However quite why it needs to be so well engineered is another question, but that is similar to a Spanish built Seat and a german built Audi they are both cars and both very similar chasis and engines but the audi makes use of some better quality materials than the Seat but at the same times elevates the price way above the cost of those components in brand and hype.

Tudor is the cheaper arm of Rolex and has been for a long time and now they are much more of a standalone brand in their own right but still rolex style quality, but never outsell Rolex, but its interesting that they can sell a very similar line up for wya less take the Pepsi GMT, Rolex brand new £7800 at launch and now £9550 (still unobtanium and rumours of it being discontinued) yet the Tudor Black Bay GMT £3780 and is still a COSC rated watch. This gives us an idea of how much extra bubble there is on the Brand, give or take a few quid maybe for some more precious metals maybe.

If Tudor can still make a healthy profit and sell a GMT model for less than half the cost of a Rolex BLRO and bith have equal movement complications, it shows exactly how much the brand name and prestigue is worth to the buyer.

I mean it does look a lot better for sure, Im surprised that the GMT movement from a Tudor hasnt been uses to franken as you would then have all the benefits of the quality parts sat inside a rep case.

Never really seen if using a Tudor gen movement could have Rolex branded parts swapped over into it in the same way as the rep super clones as this would then be a super duper clone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jackster

Kalev007

I'm Pretty Popular
25/6/19
1,811
3,412
113
I think OP completely missed the point with this the people buying fake watches from China are not even the target market for high end Swiss brands.

In my case reps were the gateway to gens so they actually won.
 

TerryRobot

Renowned Member
Patron
Certified
13/9/15
597
461
63
Modern critics wield the power of shaping the public opinion around an artist or a product. The act of criticism is judging something according to principles of beauty, goodness and truth and explore its boundaries. Hence, it's something that highly reflects personal preferences and biases. Who is to say this aspect also properly reflects the role of art/a product with respect to its proper historical and social significance? Any good orator will be able to argue whatever he wants and influence the public opinion. While until the 20th century the role of criticism was more or less occupied by scholars who knew their stuff (who were nonetheless biased in their own way), nowadays "influencing" has become a profession. Subjective evaluations aimed at market manipulation is the rule today. Getting back to the wine analogy, there's wine critics claiming they taste between 10.000 and 14.000 new wines each year. That's a lot of wine tasting per day. How can such an evaluation be objective, let alone for the organolectic capabilities of one's taste papillae which won't be equal during a year. The same way pharmaceutical companies offer "trainings" in 7-star resorts in tropical paradises wine producers offer stuff under the desk to wine critics.
With art, it's a bit different, art galleries come into play but also these will follow their interests which are to meet the tastes of those who can afford expensive art and not the tastes of the wider population or the significance of an artist and his work in relation to history, society, the evolution of art etc.
Sure, genuine art meeting these requirements still sees the light of the day, but monetary interests of a limited amount of people play a bigger role.
Well, it's quite the complex topic and it can be contradictory in itself, and I'm not able to express it as I would like to. Plus, I have top get back to work...
Here Here