-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
Clean Factory Racing Dial Daytonas Release
- Thread starter 2fast4lust
- Start date
Out of business ... oh no, damn ;{
The bezel looks not perfect, but pretty decent. Definitely better than the Noob bezels used to be ...
Here for reference my 116509 SS-Blue from NF ... (wrong 120 position, wrong "O" in "HOUR", wrong letterspace between the numbers etc.)
Always looking for a good upgrade for that ... so if you hear maybe something, would be great if you let us know.
Ah, and the new CF bezel is ok, but also not perfect, especially the Zeros are so wrong ... why oh whyyyyyy?!
Fervid
I'm Pretty Popular
- 27/5/22
- 2,631
- 3,345
- 113
It's correct for the era the dial is mimicking.
Promos up on PureTime. Really not a fan of that dial coronet
Last edited:
k.stoichkov
You're Saying I Can Sell?
- 19/4/16
- 33
- 9
- 8
Gorgeous. So i've been thinking, this watch actually don't exist with oysterflex stock but i'm starting to really want to get it and put on a vulchromatic red stripe rubberB strap using the end link it comes with (like the current wg oysterflex model). The problem is that if u search the watch in their menu it suggest the old deployant over here cuz that's how it was on this model: https://rubberb.com/en/rolex-watch-...lassic-series-vulchromatic®?selected-color=55
The current oysterflex model does not have the vulcrhomatic red stripe option tho: https://rubberb.com/en/rolex-watch-band-products/daytona-on-oysterflex-band?selected-color=138
I think the solution would be getting a vulchromatic option for the rose gold model from here: https://rubberb.com/en/rolex-watch-...lassic-series-vulchromatic®?selected-color=55
It should be the same sizing, suitable for the new style deployant etc.
What do you guys think, is it going to work?
This look <3
The current oysterflex model does not have the vulcrhomatic red stripe option tho: https://rubberb.com/en/rolex-watch-band-products/daytona-on-oysterflex-band?selected-color=138
I think the solution would be getting a vulchromatic option for the rose gold model from here: https://rubberb.com/en/rolex-watch-...lassic-series-vulchromatic®?selected-color=55
It should be the same sizing, suitable for the new style deployant etc.
What do you guys think, is it going to work?
This look <3
michaelle1193
Active Member
- 15/1/20
- 434
- 234
- 43
Looks like 116509 gray is on the way. Its listed on Steves page
I’m waiting for these
michaelle1193
Active Member
- 15/1/20
- 434
- 234
- 43
michaelle1193
Active Member
- 15/1/20
- 434
- 234
- 43
michaelle1193
Active Member
- 15/1/20
- 434
- 234
- 43
So ROLEX DID make the coronet similar to this version from CF. But the CF is still a bit to "skinny" in the middle part (over the bottom hole).
The same/similar "skinny" crown is used for the 116519LN from CF:
And here it also appears sometimes thick sometime skinny on the gens:
In contrast to that on the 116518 YG ... CF uses this coronet:
... which is really close to the gen one:
Well, I figured this all out of course after I ordered the grey 116519LN from CF (from TrustyTime at the end of July)... and in between I was a little down cause of that skinny coronet ... It hopefully will arrive in the next days (yup, waiting for around 2 months now
) ... and then I will see how this all appears without super detailed macro-shots ... and I guess/hope, it will not really bother me AT ALL
michaelle1193
Active Member
- 15/1/20
- 434
- 234
- 43
michaelle1193
Active Member
- 15/1/20
- 434
- 234
- 43
I tell u a good new that they released this model but wrong second hand now.
Had it swapped to a deep crystal.
Aka, error404 crystal not found.
Aka, error404 crystal not found.
tech
umanami
- 9/5/06
- 570
- 96
- 28
Here is a pic of my long gone gen 116509. Why are you saying the second hand is wrong? Weren't there two versions of the Panda?
Last edited:
michaelle1193
Active Member
- 15/1/20
- 434
- 234
- 43
I didn’t know that at all. Sorry for my limited knowledgeHere is a pic of my long gone gen 116509. Why are you saying the second hand is wrong? Weren't their two versions of the Panda?