Rolex Daytona JF A7750 29J vs A23J A23J

[RX7GP]

I cant decide between them, I want A7750 but everyone says its noticably thicker than A23J but its long second hand is working. And some others says that it wont work after a while, so you will end up with a not working thicker replica.

Is there any other model on market that has everything functional and same thickness as gen? For prices over 500$ ? (Talking about 116520)

Thanks

 

[BestReplicaHunter]

Yes! At your local RLX AD.
The price will definitely be over $500.

;-)

 

[TimeWillTell]

I cant decide between them, I want A7750 but everyone says its noticably thicker than A23J but its long second hand is working. And some others says that it wont work after a while, so you will end up with a not working thicker replica.

Is there any other model on market that has everything functional and same thickness as gen? For prices over 500$ ? (Talking about 116520)

Thanks

seriously i don't know how ppl could tell the thickness of the watch worn on the wrist by just looking..

 

[JohnnyBe]

[MENTION=121085]RX7GP[/MENTION] here is my 7750 replica

and here is my gen panda...on the wrist the difference is minimal

 

[Exire]

There are Some opinions about this subject and you have to Make the choice for yourself.
I prefer the 23j jf above the a7750. Just because the a7750 with sec@6 is a 'problem movement'.
The looks of the 23j are very gen like and the movement is perfect, the only problem is the non working chrono.
If you want a watch that has a working chrono but if you play with the chrono (it can be a ticking time bomb) and you accept the fact that the case is bigger ánd to pay much more then 23j, then stick with the a7750. If you want a good looking watch for a good price with a less issue movement, pick the 23j. The choice is yours


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPad met Tapatalk

 

[Exire]

23j [emoji102]

Edit: and there is no such thing as a better daytona under $500 with better movement for what i know. Correct me if i'm wrong people!

 

[Stuvetjee]

i would go for the A7750 version from JF. Because the dial finish and quality is better than the 23J version. Also im not anal about the case thickness. As shown above, its nearly visible.

 

[barth]

23j [emoji102]

Edit: and there is no such thing as a better daytona under $500 with better movement for what i know. Correct me if i'm wrong people!

Awesome ! It looks like the dial coronet has been updated, and is know more gen-looking, with a smaller and flatter inferior "circle"... Any more pics, please ?

I think this is a better alternative than the ticking timebomb 7750... At least I'm getting one of those 23J's !

 

[RX7GP]

What do you mean by ticking time bomb?

 

[barth]

What do you mean by ticking time bomb?

One day, sooner or later, the movement will die and the watch will be a paper weight.

 

[RX7GP]

As i read its fixed and improved with 29J for A7750, does that version have same issue too?

 

[BestReplicaHunter]

The A23J feels much nicer and slimmer on the wrist. Visually, the difference isn't huge (unless you are looking for it) but the feel on the wrist is totally different.

 

[barth]

As i read its fixed and improved with 29J for A7750, does that version have same issue too?

Pure marketing, as I heard.

 

[RX7GP]

23j [emoji102]
Edit: and there is no such thing as a better daytona under $500 with better movement for what i know. Correct me if i'm wrong people!

Thanks for photos, actually im willing to give over 500-600$ if there is a better version than 23J or A7750 29J

 

[RX7GP]

Pure marketing, as I heard.

thanks for heads up

 

[RX7GP]

The A23J feels much nicer and slimmer on the wrist. Visually, the difference isn't huge (unless you are looking for it) but the feel on the wrist is totally different.

23J is slimmer but it seems A7750 is better looking (as quality) than 23J

 

[d4m.test]

The "working Chrono" of the 7750 is basically useless because it will one day not work. There is a thread about how to properly use the Chrono on a 7750 and even that says to not use it haha Besides if you really want to time something you're going to use your phone, just like if you need to know the exact correct time, you use your phone.

23j is so slim and light, it feels gen. Others may not notice the thickness but you probably will

 

[RX7GP]

It seems I will end up with A23J

Does anyone have both of them and can tell the visual difference of them on looks?

 

[JohnnyBe]

i would like to add also..as you ve seen in my pics thickness on the wrist are minimal..also my rep a7750 stands strong 2 years now..i ve used the chrono the first day just to see if its working..and after one month i used it once more and that was it..since then i havent used the chrono..there is no puprose i think using it...anyway..havent serviced it...i only took it to a watchsmith to test waterproofing..it was good to go for swimming..i ve used it once for swimming no problems...by the end of 2016 i m planning on servicing it..i am actually impressed by the quality..and that it holds up in time so good..not a ticking bomb at all i would say for this one.

 

[barth]

i would like to add also..as you ve seen in my pics thickness on the wrist are minimal..also my rep a7750 stands strong 2 years now..i ve used the chrono the first day just to see if its working..and after one month i used it once more and that was it..since then i havent used the chrono..there is no puprose i think using it...anyway..havent serviced it...i only took it to a watchsmith to test waterproofing..it was good to go for swimming..i ve used it once for swimming no problems...by the end of 2016 i m planning on servicing it..i am actually impressed by the quality..and that it holds up in time so good..not a ticking bomb at all i would say for this one.

Good for you, you surely have had a good sample;

though many here took the 300$ gamble a few times, and ended up loosing their money.