Tobel
Respected Member
- 6/7/17
- 5,456
- 3,673
- 113
Yep, for example ARF's crystal is trash compared to VSF's, but not only that. I think it's pretty retarded to brush aside the crystals since:
1) you pay for it just as much as you pay for the insert, or any other part that you can replace with gen
2) not everyone will want to double the cost of the watch just to put in a gen crystal, and since we are comparing ootb reps we should compare the quality of the crystal as well
3) the logic "you can replace it with gen" is totally flawed since it works with basically any part of the watch except the case
Totally agree with this, in the end it's a matter of preferences, but it's a fact that you can see a crystal, while you cannot see the lug engravings, so comparing the lugs engravings in order to define the best sub and not comparing the quality of the cyclops / BH / HE it totally braindead imo
Idk bro this looks more and more like ARF is being covered for still making a trash crystal lmao
Yes we have now understood your point. You are sensitive to crystals, but reality is that even if it's bigger than the rehaut engraving, most people can't tell the difference between a gen and a rep crystal, and they have no clue about black hole.
So please let's leave it at this, no need to respond to this message, let's please stop arguing