-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
"Who Has the Best Sub" Blind Rate - Need your help
- Thread starter puretime
- Start date
- 17/4/17
- 843
- 707
- 93
I think they are more critical than SEL engravings or case engravings.
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
- 17/4/17
- 843
- 707
- 93
@puretime not the side profile, as much as the top/frontal view thats more important. We are judging the frontal view in one of the threads, but I think CGs should have their own thread ND ratings
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
mari115
Respected Member
That's very cool, thank you!
It's a pity that the VRF isn't being included, they came out with their new subs recently but they were overshadowed by the others
I know since the pics dont show too much difference and I will only add that part in my review. No pics.
- 4/9/20
- 2,880
- 3,448
- 113
I’d have liked to see a copy pic of the gen beside each other pic, scrolling up and down past a few other watches to compare, the details can be missed. I’ll try with two browsers open and rate best the one looks most genuine rather than what look I prefer/remember being most like the gen pic.
thanks for this, a lot of time and effort there. Respect
thanks for this, a lot of time and effort there. Respect
Last edited:
I did try to picture the CG but failed, so I will only include my opinions on the CGs in my review in about one week time.
Yeah I realised that out affter I have done it but I think the review is sufficient for everyone to figure out the best SUB with this comparo
True and thanks for the advice and I will do another review on other watches and I will defintely consider that.
You can download all the pics onto your computer if that helps.
The more I look into the individual threads, the more I get to the conclusion that quite a number of factors are up to tolerance. While a single watch might have a better SEL recess/tightness, crystal height, rehaut alignment, clasp fit, DW print, it might be totally different on the next one.
mari115
Respected Member
Why aren't the most important (easy to spot) things, like Black Hole and Halo Effect, being compared?
By the way puretime , you should have compared the LNs, not the LVs.
Comparing LVs under studio lightning is totally useless since the real sunburst / color of the dial / bezel isn't well represented. Unless of course we are talking about natural lightning.
You should have compared LNs, so that you could have compared the black hole as well.
Good job anyways!
By the way puretime , you should have compared the LNs, not the LVs.
Comparing LVs under studio lightning is totally useless since the real sunburst / color of the dial / bezel isn't well represented. Unless of course we are talking about natural lightning.
You should have compared LNs, so that you could have compared the black hole as well.
Good job anyways!
- 18/3/13
- 14,093
- 2,220
- 113
I agree. In Angus pic it looks like the end link goes as far the lugs. Ive just checked. Thats not how it looks on my VSF.whats wrong with the SEL on VSF in the front view, this can't be the real SEL lol
You can see quite some differences in the CGs on your front view pictures (see below), so I included them in the ratings there. Didn't vote for pointless stuff like caseback teeth, or invisible engravings though as well as things that are up to tolerances and different on every single watch like lug/SEL gaps.
Last edited:
No I already told you my method.
I make no attempt to identify the maker. If I am able to tell based off of a certain flaw which maker it is, it’s gets minus a point for the flaw.
It seems like you assume everyone wants to play favorites.
Last edited: