Both are fantastic watches, the TC is closer to Gen, the BK with the ceramic bezel looks and wears "bigger" and is (much) more comfortable because of the adjustable glidelock clasp. The TC bracelet is very close to gen and feels light and flimsy, the BK is not so close to gen and has flaws but feels heavy, solid and well made. All the rest is comparing apples with oranges, different watches, the V5 has fat dial markers and blue lume, the TC has thin dial dots and green lume, the TC insert is aluminium and close to gen, the Noob V5 insert is ceramic and only superficially close to anything.
Sumikito has summed it up, I´ll put it with my words: TC is far superior in direct comparison.
One look at them side by side and You "know" the TC "is gen" and the BK "is fake". It´s the shine of the polished markers of the TC dial, the deepness of the black, the crispness and sharpness of the lettering and the crown on the dial, the distance of the hands to the dial, a sum of details and not a stand-alone fact.
You put a TC side by side with a 16610 and You have difficulty telling them apart otb, put a gen insert and crown on the TC and it gets almost impossible;
Take a BK and put it next to a gen 116610 and You know instantly which is which, it takes less than 5 seconds.
A TC has handpicked parts for every detail and a superior dial, the BK is a Noob V5 with better qc and a better movement than the otb Noob V5. You "need" to buy a TC without alternative, You can anytime buy a Noob V5 from TD´s for far less than it costs with BK (I´m not saying BK is not worth it, alone the movement makes up for the difference and the additional qc is for free, the thing is You don´t absolutely "need" a better movement than the ETA-clone and if wanted You can always put it in later, this may be 5 or 6 Years later).
Modded by TC himself 16610 lumeshot
Noob V5 from Toro