I did ask my TD about the subs, they said they were out of stock on them. So it might be dependent on the TDs sone might be out while some still have a few around.
Sent from my HTC 10
Definitely ask each TD. Some might still have them.
I did ask my TD about the subs, they said they were out of stock on them. So it might be dependent on the TDs sone might be out while some still have a few around.
Sent from my HTC 10
All fixed and back in the game [emoji4]
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hi can I see more pictures of your strap ?
Hey just wondering what are the chances of this being regarded as a super rep? I thought the 441 had the flaw of 24hr gmt. Since the 312 has no gmt, is there a chance for this to be super rep status, or some things still off?
Sent from my HTC 10
Well not really. Morw informational purposes. I actually did place an order myself for 1359 (changed order from 441 and 1312) so that's no issue for me.Does it matter if it does have that status ? its very close but also with the so called super reps there are still a few flaws wich can be noticed by trained eyes, the new VSF is a nice rep the movement looks identical but under the hood its not, while the 111 etc have a similar movenent design so makes this more a super rep or not?
Well not really. Morw informational purposes. I actually did place an order myself for 1359 (changed order from 441 and 1312) so that's no issue for me.
Sent from my HTC 10
These new watches are really awesome reps. Indeed the best versions available so far.
PAM 441 could not e a super rep due to GMT 24 hrs instead of 12 hrs like gen, and the crown functions which are not at all the same as gen
PAM 312 has the advantage of not having GMAT function but the crown functions remain the same (inaccurate and obvious flaw. If we consider it a Super rep it would be"bordering lower status". Although I would lean towards: First Class rep bordering Super rep status
We will see
ALE
Hi Ale. New member here. Just wanted to tell you how appreciative I am for all the information you have provided. I have spent many hours looking through your guide and the detail is fantastic. Thanks for taking the time to put it together! - Jeff
My kw 312 got problem , yesterday wore whole day , today wake up watch stop at 4am , power server weak . Last year already sent back for repair . Thinking to get vsf 312 but worry can't last longer. Or should I get a 2nd hand gen ?
To get a gen is a deeply personal choice, if you so feel that the experience with reps disappoints you that much, then maybe it is for you. I've had some not so good experience with reps, considering how many I've bought already through the years. But nothing that would discourage me from continuously buying reps. I just temper my experience with acceptance of what is the reality of owning a rep. It softens the blow for the most part.![]()
These new watches are really awesome reps. Indeed the best versions available so far.
PAM 441 could not e a super rep due to GMT 24 hrs instead of 12 hrs like gen, and the crown functions which are not at all the same as gen
PAM 312 has the advantage of not having GMAT function but the crown functions remain the same (inaccurate and obvious flaw. If we consider it a Super rep it would be"bordering lower status". Although I would lean towards: First Class rep bordering Super rep status
We will see
ALE
Absolutely agree here. I've had both gen and rep in hand. I definitely agree with first class rep bordering super rep status.
The differences are: DW font color (big tell), DW font not entirely correct, DW slightly too deep. Bezel edge not as smooth as gen. Trademark engraving not as deep. CG lever doesn't snap shut as well as gen. Finishing on CG not as good. CG not as flush with case as gen. And of course the movement is not the same - there are differences but one would have to know exactly what to look at. And of course P9000 functions.
I have to say the dial finishing is as good as gen. Case is also very good. As you can see I scrutinize a lot, and I cannot find a difference between rep and gen looking at the dial to my naked eye. Overall feel of the watch is exactly as gen. So my conclusion is while its not a 'super rep', the level of finishing and quality on this watch is very good.
Absolutely agree here. I've had both gen and rep in hand. I definitely agree with first class rep bordering super rep status.
The differences are: DW font color (big tell), DW font not entirely correct, DW slightly too deep. Bezel edge not as smooth as gen. Trademark engraving not as deep. CG lever doesn't snap shut as well as gen. Finishing on CG not as good. CG not as flush with case as gen. And of course the movement is not the same - there are differences but one would have to know exactly what to look at. And of course P9000 functions.
I have to say the dial finishing is as good as gen. Case is also very good. As you can see I scrutinize a lot, and I cannot find a difference between rep and gen looking at the dial to my naked eye. Overall feel of the watch is exactly as gen. So my conclusion is while its not a 'super rep', the level of finishing and quality on this watch is very good.