It is a far cry from $100. This is an outlandish statement. You simply don't know our expenses. Please don't assume like this.
No offense Sir, I deliberately did not respond to the other posts, because such a thing only ends in dispute but, let this be my last post here on this thread (or forum, that's up to you if you think I was disrespectful or insolent with the things I've said and say).
I mentioned in one of my posts that if the cost reached or exceeded $100 USD monthly, I would fire my webmaster.
This is due to the fact that this complete web presence should not cost more than 50 euros per month. Anything above that can only come about because someone hasn't looked at cheaper alternatives, or ultimately has no idea what the webmaster/hosting-market looks like. (This is not an accusation or assumption, and it's also nothing which I refer to you! - It's a pity that I have to mention this at all because of the previous discussions which I had in this topic, but as I said, I'm not directly referring to you).
I was just saying that if the monthly cost reaches or exceeds $100 USD, it is a waste of money.
It is not my opinion, but a fact. There are warez sites that host terabytes of data, which even use offshore hosting providers and pay less than 100 USD per month.
These sites have to deal with strong DDoS attacks, which Cloudflare alone can't even handle, unless you pay huge amounts for their biggest plans. Such operators bypass this completely by having a flawless configuration of their firewall. And wham! Several thousands of dollars saved.
Although you might take this personally, to me the price of over $100 USD is very unrealistic. Unless, as mentioned above, you haven't looked into alternatives or don't know much about web mastering or the hosting market.