The gen 3235 mainspring & barrel is considered a consumable (ie not serviceable) part of the movement. I don’t open the barrel to service the mainspring when I work on a vs3235 (or dd3285). I might be wrong, but I think one issue is that the 3235 mainspring is wound in the opposite direction compared to normal Swiss mainsprings (ie in the Japanese mainspring direction). This means you’d need a new mainspring winder to get the spring back into the barrel since the existing 3135 winder would have the wrong arbor… but I’m not 100% on the direction of the coil thing.I read somewhere that the barrel is sealed on the vs3235 and can’t be serviced. Are the mainsprings thinner longer or stronger in some way? Just trying to figure out how they were able to boost the power reserve to 72 hrs in the reps. I read they boosted the Gen 3235 about 15% through less mass and inertia by skeletonizing the escape wheel. However that still doesn’t account for all the additional boost they achieved in the Gen 3235. These are really incredible movements but I wonder if trade off were made or actual improvements. What’s your thoughts on the 3235 and common problems you’ve encountered?
I believe the gen mainspring is also slightly softer / less stiff than the VS version. I’ve seen movements drop a bit in amplitude when I replaced the mainspring barrel with a gen one. This makes sense though. The gen train wheels / escapement will have lower friction compared with the rep, so a less powerful mainspring would be needed to drive it. That probably explains why the gen gets 72 hours of power reserve and the rep gets slightly less. Power reserve is a function of the physical length of the mainspring. A thinner mainspring (weaker) can be longer and still be wound into a barrel of a fix diameter. The rep mainspring is probably slightly thicker (stronger) so it has to be slightly shorter to be wound into the same size barrel.