I wait for first reviews, becouse after begin updated
It may or may not be updated and what's updated is totally up to the factory. But we can wait for reviews.
Last edited:
I wait for first reviews, becouse after begin updated
Very good news to see a P9010 super clone movement. It seams Panerai reps arent dead
That's not a P.9010, that's a P.9000. I guess it was a choice between using a movement which only looks like the gen but no gen functions or a movement that does not look like the gen but has gen functions and it seems they chose the latter option as this is a closed caseback.
Ok, so it's cool to see a P9000 decorated as a P9010 and with gen function like you said
I know this probably isn't the place for the question but I ask before on a Panerai board, in the Rolex Forum in the Panerai forum, several other places it never really got an answer.It is not decorated as a P.9010. Changing P.9000 to P.9010 with everything visually being the same as a P.9000 is not "decoration". The A7750 used in the PAM01XXX series is a decorated movement as the appearance of the A7750 was changed with the addition of plates to the base movement. Nice to have the gen function sure, but the thickness seems to be incorrect (based on the TD link not on the actual measurement), which is a shame, since the reps using the A7750 decorated P.9010 were thinner than their P.9000 counterparts, I.E. PAM1389 vs PAM389, PAM1312 vs PAM312, etc.
Hopefully they rep this too...
Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk
I know this probably isn't the place for the question but I ask before on a Panerai board, in the Rolex Forum in the Panerai forum, several other places it never really got an answer.
How does Panerai's numbering/model system work? Is there a method to the madness or do they really just randomly give it a pamxxxxx number?
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Does the date go backwards too? No one ever runs the date back in these rep vids. Only forward like the movement is going to to explode if taken back or something.