[VSF] PAM1441

[dadog13]

New day, new PAM released..

 

[KOT1917]

We are waiting for information about the thickness, and find out if we are getting superrep for the first time in a long time, thanks to solid caseback.

 

[blim]

May I know which chinese website you got that information from?

I'd like to take a look too since I understand mandarin

 

[centrum]

Wow. It's great that it's got a closed case back. But I don't know what to think of the blue accent. I prefer the regular second hand to this one.

Will the GMT function work properly or like the gen?

Sent from my SM-G977N using Tapatalk

 

[jonnybaws]

Thanks dadog13 ... I do hope with this Ceramic release they follow-up with a 508 re-release.. that said, I've never had this Pam in any of its variants, and I'm a sucker for a GMT movement.. will be hard not to add this to the stable!

 

[KOT1917]

Wow. It's great that it's got a closed case back. But I don't know what to think of the blue accent. I prefer the regular second hand to this one.
Will the GMT function work properly or like the gen?
Sent from my SM-G977N using Tapatalk

I think they will put the same clone there that was in 441, 438 and other gmt.
I also don’t like blue accents, but it seems that there’s just a minimal number of them. It seems that even I would have resigned ...

 

[Sharki06]

amazing , VSF is in killing spree , i want to buy all their last release xD

but damn, i hope the next it's the 1438 , i prefer the whole ceramic look !

 

[KOT1917]

By the way, 1438 also now has a solid caseback, and does not have a blue second hand. It would be nice. By the way, profile photos 438 and 1438, I think the difference between 441 and 1441 should be the same.




https://ru.imgbb.com/

 

[Repworld]

officially my first pam , i’m sorry 0005..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Repworld]

https://trustytime.io/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37_51&products_id=22390


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Repworld]

By the way, 1438 also now has a solid caseback, and does not have a blue second hand. It would be nice. By the way, profile photos 438 and 1438, I think the difference between 441 and 1441 should be the same.




https://ru.imgbb.com/

https://www.chrono24.ae/panerai/pan...ck-dial-mens-watch---pam01438--id13055189.htm


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Repworld]

this’s better choice ever in my opinion, they have gen sample and comparison since v1 , they show side by side everything , i think older vsf added super rep in rwi .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[KOT1917]

https://trustytime.io/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37_51&products_id=22390

Old case ... 18 mm.

 

[Repworld]

Old case ... 18 mm.

what’s that mean??
here gen vs rep http://m.v.qq.com/play/play.html?vi...from=copy&pgid=page_detail&mod_id=mod_toolbar


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Repworld]

http://www.watchleader.com/archives/30887


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Repworld]

http://m.v.qq.com/play/play.html?vi...from=copy&pgid=page_detail&mod_id=mod_toolbar


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[superspark69]

what’s that mean??
here gen vs rep http://m.v.qq.com/play/play.html?vi...from=copy&pgid=page_detail&mod_id=mod_toolbar


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

thats the 441, not 1441, trusty at the moment lists the case thickness at 18mm, the 1441 should be thinner at 14mm, however this could be a typo from trusty but until its confirmed otherwise, the thickness is incorrect.

 

[preppyr6]

Is the only difference between 441 (which I have) and 1441 the blue accent and closed caseback? I like ceramic PAMs but dunno if I need near-twinsies

 

[jonnybaws]

Is the only difference between 441 (which I have) and 1441 the blue accent and closed caseback? I like ceramic PAMs but dunno if I need near-twinsies

Dial printing too.. doesn't the 441 say CERAMICA at 6? Were the 1441 has PANERAI with Automatic underneath it at 6?

 

[Repworld]

thats the 441, not 1441, trusty at the moment lists the case thickness at 18mm, the 1441 should be thinner at 14mm, however this could be a typo from trusty but until its confirmed otherwise, the thickness is incorrect.

i’m confused


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk