Alright seems like I missed all the fun when I unfollowed this thread!
. and I asked for your wise account , but your account setting make I can not find your account . so , I ask you give me your bank information , I will send the money to your bank directly , you replied ,whether I am crazy ? I want to get your bank account to steal your money !!!!
Back on topic, for someone who has read the message chain spill resulting from OP's uncontrollable internal organ movement before it was cleaned up by RWI's janitorial squad (still waiting for them to confirm which organ it was) I can attest that this is true. Tony did indeed inform OP that he could not find him on Wise with the info provided and requested his bank info to make the refund and OP went immediately apeshit and accused Tony that he only wanted his banking info to steal his money.
And seeing OP's self-satisfied reaction after he got his refund, I have the feeling that this thread was indeed only intended on pressuring Tony to bend backwards to speed up the process even more. OP might consider it fair game but I sure do not. And the thing is that if this "trend" continues, it will get to the point where legitimate issues will become more difficult to properly address.
Ideally, posting in the reviews section should be limited to persons who can establish that they have indeed conducted a transaction with that TD and have had a legitimate unresolved issue.
Since I understand that it is not possible for RWI's staff to absorb the amount of work that this will require, and since
@Feefo has confirmed that:
RWI does NOT offer any support for transactions occurred before the member subscribed to RWI.
Maybe we could restrict the posting of reviews to members with a minimum post/time on RWI?