- 18/12/09
- 2,606
- 1,876
- 113
Wasn't there an expert, someone who works in the metallurgy field, who said on here somewhere that there's no real difference in tooling? And not much difference in price. So yeah, it's basically Rolex with the fake marketing, making us think 904 is better and pricier when neither is especially true.
Every time the “904L is better” debate comes out I end up trying to remember which steel is used on the Patek Philippe Nautilus or the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak...
“Oh, but these are not real tool watches, tool watches NEED to use that mythical 904L steel!”. And then I Google again about the JLC Master Compressor (Navy Seals) or the Omega SpeedMaster Pro (the NASA, no less) and I think “yep, useless bellends, you got scammed with that 304L crap instead of using the better-than-adamantium-and-mythril-combined 904L wonder”.
And then I proceed to spend a €100 premium on a fake-904L fake watch. Because that’s what we do. Collectors! Lovely hobby!”, lol!
PD: Even Jacques Cousteau RECKLESSLY DARED to get INTO the sea with 304L useless pieces of junk from Doxa, Omega or even Rolex (hang on, my head is about to explode now)...